🌻Docusign(DOCU), Crowdstrike(CRWD)財報結果
上週這兩家公司發表財報了.
這兩天看了一下他們的財報結果. Again, 兩家的表現都很好, 但發現分析師給DOCU的調價(往上)幅度比較多, 就好奇研究了一下SaaS公司是怎麼被估值的. 有興趣的話可以看看(從中學習到很多. 非常推薦一讀):
https://makingsenseofusastocks.blogspot.com/2021/09/blog-post.html
(By the way, 分析師對CRWD的價格調幅沒那麼大, 主因是成長趨緩了. 而DOCU的free cash flow佔營收比, 以及顧客黏著力在這季創了新高, 是讓分析師按讚的幾個原因).
關於CRWD: "The Street is already modeling revenue growth deceleration in 2022 to 36%, down from 60% expected in 2021, which on its own might prove a hurdle for a stock already trading at a high multiple," said Bank of America analyst Tal Liani in a report.
分析師對於DOCU的評價:
• 11位buy; 給的價格分別是: $310, $320 (x2), $330 (x2), $340 (x2), $345, $350, $350, $389
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst continues to view them as a best in class way to play digital transformation trends with strong growth, cash flow and profitability, and a strong competitive position. Power said DocuSign remains one of his top long-term compounding growth ideas.
o Citi: While slightly shy of the double-digit billings beat in recent quarters, DocuSign still delivered a solid 8% beat to Q2 billings, which grew 47% year-over-year, Radke tells investors in a research note.
o Evercore ISI: he calls "another strong quarter." While some may have wanted to see more aggressive Q3 billings guidance, he believes estimates "continue to leave room for upside," Materne said.
o JMP Securities: While revenue growth decelerated to 50% from 58% in Q1, the company is the clear leader in electronic signature and the broader system of agreement having crossed over 1M customers with a $2B run rate this quarter, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that he sees lots of room for growth as DocuSign targets a $50B total addressable market.
o Needham: The analyst commented, "Docusign reported another strong quarter in 2QF22 with typical DOCU upside to revenue and profitability. Sales metrics and growth decelerated Q/Q, as we expected against a massive pandemic quarter, but at a much slower rate than we believe much of the Street was anticipating. 65k net new customers was lower than the 70k - 90 range of CY20 but was still more than 2x greater than any pre-pandemic quarter, highlighting a strong end-market driving 47% billings growth against a strong comp. Commentary on incremental Agreement Cloud demand was positive, suggesting an additional growth tailwind combined with solid international can further aid 2HF22. Although DOCU shares could be lower near-term due to weak 2H OpMg guidance, we think this guidance is conservative, as the recent OM was greater than the pre-pandemic level even with tough comps."
o RBC Capital: The quarter highlighted the sustainability of the company's tailwinds post-pandemic as most of its underlying metrics such as billings and net revenue retention were solid, the analyst tells investors in a research note, adding that the traction with CLM and Notary was also "impressive".
分析師對於CRWD的評價:
• 12位buy; 給的價格分別是: $300, $310 (x2), $313, $315 (x2) , $305, $320, $325, $330 (x2), $340
• 1位給hold: $280 (from $220 by J.P. Morgan(same))
• 給Buy的分析師的評語:
o Baird: The analyst believes the company has significant room for growth with core modules, opportunities with Humio and in cloud workload security, among others, should help drive a continuation of strong growth over a long time horizon.
o BTIG: The company's "strong" Q2 results "cleared every hurdle", even though the buy-side benchmarks may have been slightly higher, the analyst tells investors in a research note. Powell adds that Crowdstrike is clearly gaining share in its core endpoint security target market at a rapid pace and gaining traction with new products across multiple categories.
o Canaccord: The analyst said the stock is down from its recent highs, and he thinks the re-rating creates a more favorable entry point for longer-oriented investors for a foundational security name. He views Crowdstrike as a long-term secular winner in security due to its native cloud platform advantage versus closely held peers in endpoint security combined with platform expansion into tangential segments to capture greater share of security budgets.
o Goldman Sachs: CrowdStrike last night delivered "another beat and raise quarter as the company benefited from another quarter of elevated demand," Essex said. But it traded lower following net new annual recurring revenue growth guidance that was slightly less than investors had hoped for. Essex, nonetheless, said the quarter demonstrated CrowdStrike's "ability to continue to go down market efficiently."
o JMP Securities: The analyst notes the company's Q2 annualized recurring revenue of $1.34B topping his estimate of $1.30B, with "sustained" 70% ARR and revenue growth along with margin upside seen as key highlights for the quarter. Suppiger adds that the metrics reflect Crowdstrike's "strong execution and robust demand environment".
o Mizuho: "very good" fiscal Q2 results. The annual recurring revenue growth of 70% year-over-year "was strong and still nicely surpassed" the Street's 65%-66% estimate, Moskowitz tells investors in a research note. He believes "strong execution can propel" Crowdstrike's stock higher.
o Piper Sandler: The company's metrics "outperformed across the board" in Q2 with 70% annual recurring revenue and revenue growth and record net new customer adds in the quarter, Owens tells investors in a research note.
o RBC Capital: Hedberg adds that CrowdStrike's record pipeline entering Q3 should continue to fuel the company's "land-and-expand" momentum.
o Stifel: Q2 results that he said "exceeded consensus estimates across all major financial metrics." He continues to believe that Crowdstrike's growth opportunity "remains in the early days" despite the company's scale given continued share capture within its core endpoint security market and incremental module adoption on the Falcon Platform, Reback tells investors.
o UBS: the company reported "pretty good" Q2 results against high expectations.
🌻趨勢: 跨境電商 Cross-border commerce
Morgan Stanley:
From our perspective, we think many are underestimating what the cross-border eCommerce demand could ultimately be, once key friction points like FX rates, tax and duties, shipping, language, etc are smoothed—all issues that Global-E directly addresses.
Cross-border ecommerce brings new, high-yield volume: We think elevated levels of cross-border ecommerce (ex-travel) is a structural shift thathas yet to be fully contemplated in MA (and V)'s long-term forecasts. MA's cross-border CNP ex-travel volume was 69% above 2019's level in 2Q and 63% higher in 1Q. Strength reflects both broader ecommerce adoption plus globalization of commerce, as marketplaces and services that reduce cross-border friction (such as those from GLBE) make international online ordering more readily adopted. Early data at V suggests greater cross-border ecommerce spend is persisting even in areas with pre-pandemic levels of international travel. Cross-border transactions also come at a higher yield, making us more optimistic that the trend can bring incremental long-term growth to the networks.
產業的潮流是有連貫性的. 疫情讓電商更發達後, 接下來應該就是加速電商跨境了. 跨境的話, 有很多問題需要解決(稅率, 語言, etc.) 這就需要有公司來做整合的動作. 這種跨境, 也可以想像是omnichannel的一種呈現.
Harley Finkelstein (President of Shopify): "I mean I think commerce in 2021 is cross-border."
🌻SPAC熱潮退卻,初創市值蒸發750億美元
"SPAC熱潮已經退卻。分析顯示,在2月中旬以前完成合併的137家SPAC的總市值已經蒸發25%,市值回落幅度上個月一度超過1,000億美元。"
"像貝萊德(BlackRock Inc., BLK)和富達投資(Fidelity Investments Inc.)這類企業管理的基金,以及許多對沖基金、養老金管理公司和其他一些投資者,都在SPAC的回落中遭受了衝擊,他們在去年年底開始的熱潮中競相投資SPAC。其中許多基金由於在價格還很低的時候就早早入場,所以現在仍坐擁可觀收益。事實上,SPAC市值仍有約2,500億美元,高於一年前的約1,000億美元,反映出這期間股價上漲和新公司上市的影響。
但即便如此,今年年初令人炫目的回報還是讓許多後來者做了接盤俠,扎堆投資所謂穩賺不賠的領域,其永恆的風險可見一斑。在過去的幾個月裡,一些投資者眼睜睜看著帳面財富縮水。"
"股價下跌會在SPAC領域形成惡性循環,因為投資者有權在併購交易前從空白支票公司撤資。一旦SPAC跌破發行價,投資者就更有可能這樣做,而許多SPAC的股價現在正處於這樣的水平。目前,在尚未宣布併購交易的空白支票公司中,超過95%的公司股價低於發行價。
投資者的大規模撤資會讓已經上市的空白支票公司手上的現金大幅減少,讓其更難實現業務目標,並可能加劇股價跌勢。"
https://on.wsj.com/3n6JznC
🌻BNPL (buy now pay later)
But most BNPL providers including Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay have been losing money despite breakneck revenue growth as they invest heavily in marketing to win share. Sweden-based Klarna’s credit losses more than doubled in the second quarter. Affirm has projected adjusted operating losses of $50m-$55m for the fiscal year that ended June 30.
The path to profitability for many of these companies was to achieve massive scale, analysts said.
https://www.ft.com/content/ca201a37-a16d-4223-b123-04d38350a972
Pictures: 一葉知秋; from EarningsWhispers
「.net core 發行」的推薦目錄:
- 關於.net core 發行 在 貓的成長美股異想世界 Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於.net core 發行 在 君子馬蘭頭 - Ivan Li 李聲揚 Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於.net core 發行 在 軟體開發學習資訊分享 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於.net core 發行 在 匯入發行設定以發行至IIS - GitHub 的評價
- 關於.net core 發行 在 ASP.NET Core 啟用Web.config Transformation | Ray's Notes 的評價
- 關於.net core 發行 在 Will 保哥的技術交流中心- .NET Core 3.0 將內建#單一檔案發行... 的評價
- 關於.net core 發行 在 NET Core 3.0 正式公布:新特性詳細解讀 - PTT新聞 的評價
.net core 發行 在 君子馬蘭頭 - Ivan Li 李聲揚 Facebook 的最佳解答
[TVB(511)業績: 好似唔大鑊,其實好大鑊,可能會死,但冇咁快]
多圖,建議睇medium 版
無可避免講少少政治,其實非我所願,不喜勿插。喜都好,唔好集中在嗰啲地方。
1. 上次篇有線反應還好(https://bit.ly/2RckabJ) ,所以繼續寫。係呀,幸福唔係必然的。寫TVB嘅嘢,基本上出面啲友,一係平舖直述(冇法,你估好高人工咩,又唔止做一隻古),一係就加咗自己啲想像,總之屌TVB就實有人讚好。
2.例如講「TVB舊年年中「得返」7億現金,而只係出糧一個月都燒1.3億。」(https://bit.ly/2UT4NpE) 呢啲,咪擺明引導你,以為人地真係就執笠。而讀者多數都係唔撚用腦的。好簡單,舊年年中得返7億,只係出糧都一個月燒1.3億,即係5個幾月燒完啦?咁仲有得出業績?應該舊年十二月死咗啦可?仲只係計出糧未計其他喎。咁事實死咗未丫?「未死都就死」。活地亞倫話齋,we are all dying添。
3.本人向來唔行呢套,素來以提升讀者水平為責任。其實真係用撚下腦。埃汾而家現金好似得返幾千,屌你一個月供樓都萬幾啦,未計個個星期打邊爐一千添,一個月供樓食飯都兩皮幾。咁我跳咗樓未?係呀,埃汾糧頭得返幾千現金,一個月供樓都一萬,食飯又幾千,步入倒數階段啦(其實個個由出世開始已經步人倒數階段)
4. 好,睇完啲錯嘅示範,畀啲堅嘢你。業績下話。就下面咁,我就勸你唔好去睇原本嗰份嘢了(https://bit.ly/2WU2e9m),都幾複雜。其實以一間都咁多業務嘅公司嚟講,TVB啲數唔算太難睇,奈何之前不務正業搞咗堆咩「星美」嘅東西,就很煩。唔止係搞衰,有時係掉轉,令你以為只係因為星美衰佢先衰,睇唔到真正嘅問題。
5. 講多少少,呢段好重要,你可以copy低去第度先。公司買咗兩隻「星美」既債,一隻係隻23球美金(港紙1.8億)嘅定息債,以下就咁叫「星美債」,另一隻係可換股債券,CB,83球美金(港紙6.5億),以下就叫「星美CB」。咩係CB,睇舊文(https://bit.ly/2RckabJ),唔解,不過而家都不重要,基本上兩隻都真係變廢紙,最新已經write off 晒。下次唔使再見到
6. 嚟啦喎,星美嗰堆嘢,在18 19呢兩隻業績全數打晒靶,8.3億兩年就咁冇撚晒,真係極其戇鳩。但反正股票睇前景,鞭屍講管理層不知所謂(事實係),大把文寫過。而家只講對業績同將來嘅影響。你見到嘅係,首先隻星美CB,6.5億,18年減值咗3.2億,19年(下半年做的)減值咗3.3億,變零,樓上星美CB一行見到。再上面一行,「金融資產減值&星美債」,煩啲,因為有其他嘢。簡單嚟講,星美債嗰1.8億,2018年已減值晒。你話,喂,明明2.3億喎。咁因為仲有其他嘢,正如今年仲有,但「幾千萬咁濕碎唔好計」
7. 幫大家貼多次個表,同上面一樣的。勾咗呢堆乜嘢星美出嚟,你見到有一行叫做「唔計星美」嘅東西,我計出嚟,公司都有提呢個數。仲有一個叫做哥牙易必打嘅東西,core EBITDA(唔知易必打係乜又係睇舊文)(https://bit.ly/2RckabJ),其實官方好似叫兀質時突易必打,是但。即係唔計星美又唔計稅呀折舊呀攤銷呀利息呀咁嘅核心「盈利」。冇問題的,好多公司都會公佈呢啲數
8. 做咗呢啲,就好易睇了。官方講話19年「核心業務」賺錢,冇錯喎。留意唔係講哥牙易必打,易必打唔係賺錢,唔好咁狗,下個月你拎啲易必打去交租丫。係講「唔計星美」,3500萬盈利,好過冇,叫做打平。咁好似唔係幾差啫?
9. 問題係,其實再之前一年(18),「唔計星美」,你賺成3億喎!即係個核心業務大倒退的。如果只係睇頭條,「蝕兩億變蝕三億不過其實我主業賺錢」,就睇唔到咁大件事了。而就算你睇個哥牙易必打,都係按年大跌的,7.8億跌到4.6億。
10. 仲有更大問題係,19年下半年比上半年差好多。公司19年上半年業績,其實唔太失禮,有2億賺喎。雖然long住個星美炸彈響度,但都不過3.3億,痛還痛,一次架啫。但下半年就大檸樂啦。你睇返下半年,「唔計星美」,公司蝕1.8億,貨真價實,而上年年賺緊2.2億喎(計唔計星美都一樣,上半年冇呢啲東西)。計哥牙易必打,仲大劑,下半年蝕,上半年賺緊5億。乜料?
11. 咁唔使佛地魔唔敢講,大家都知,下半年係咩事。反送中嘛。的確見到抽咗好多廣告,你睇第一行個收入大跌就知。有話係經濟唔好?又係事實,但大家知廣告筆直嘅嘢,好多時唔係話抽就抽,經濟唔好都要滯後啲先見到。證據?你見NOW,VIU同有線,下半年並冇特別比上半年差的。所以呢度的確見到反送中好大影響。你見到咩提爆中銀或者燒佢機,純係感情宣泄,對拖低人地公司冇乜影響。但杯葛TVB(或者叫啲公司唔好落廣告)嘅影響係大的,又夠文明,合法,冇破壞財物。啱我呢啲和理非(純技術分析,不構成任何建議,而其實我N咁多年都唔睇TVB,應該話我係唔睇電視嘅,我屋企個有線壞撚咗成年我先整,公司應該多謝我個個月白畀錢)
12. 咁只能講句,上年下半年好大鑊,今年上半年更大鑊。抽嘅廣告係咪抽晒?應該未必,都話有啲一早落咗筆直,但到期就可以唔續,續都可以壓價。況且,仲有全人類都影響嘅,肺炎。呢個乜台都死。今年中期見真章,下半年應該都好難睇。
13. 咁但,死還死,七孔流血還七孔流血。大鑊還大鑊,同執笠呢,都仲有啲距離。國泰(293)上個月一個月就蝕咗20億添。一個月喎大佬!雖然國泰規模(計book value)差不多係TVB十倍,但,國泰一個月蝕20億喎!等於TVB一個月蝕2億,而現實TVB一年先蝕幾億。希望明我講乜。至於有線甚麼,得幾億book ,一年就蝕幾億,應該呢刻已經班緊水(其實冇一刻唔係班緊),隨時死。所以,要執笠有排未到TVB
14. 點解TVB唔使死住?因為底子厚,正如我在明報文講(篇文主要講王維基)(https://bit.ly/39zmLmo):爛船三斤釘,長遠可能都係死,但短期,兩三年生存不成問題,祖先生性,剩下大把家產慢慢敗,其實如果正正經經做膠劇唔去買乜鬼債券唔使蝕咁快。但無論如何都係嗰句,心田先祖種福地後人耕,生生性性拍下膠劇,投下共,玩多幾年冇問題,甚至唔使咁快集資—屌你,TVB今年仲有息派呀(居然有人以為蝕錢唔可以/唔會派息,其實你諗下,既然賺錢可以唔派息,蝕錢當然亦可以派息)。
15. To be more precise,你睇TVB,十鳩幾億現水(係喎,唔係蘋果篇文話人地年中得七億出糧一個月都一億幾咩,做乜年尾又有十一億?),貸款先得廿幾億。你睇個叻基牙寧,即係net debt / equity ,根本仲健康過往年。因為減咗債。留意個equity仲要大縮咗水喎,一年唔見咗7億,除咗因為蝕錢亦因為派息,蝕住錢派息就係咁架啦,祖蔭大把。舊年下半年,TVB唔計星美,蝕緊1.8億。咁我當之後年年蝕夠5億,都點都頂到四五年起碼。
16. 唔好同其他行業比,但TVB嘅叻基牙寧先廿個巴仙,相當健康,健康過陳健康—而有線講緊係68%—除非有線債主隻CB換股啦(我有理由相信有機會炒高佢)—換咗股個叻基牙寧咪低,但股價照樣大跌,因為大手攤薄。
17. 未來?我都唔知有乜未來,我甚至唔知呢個城市有乜未來,或者我有乜未來,只係知山本未來(OK,好爛)。但勉強睇下。我估,都係投共有前途,once you go red never go back.有線都要投共(中移動),正如玉女(玉玉地啦)都下海,咁一早已經露點嘅TVB真係唔爭在啦,對不?一件污 二件穢 三件無所謂,你班友成日講易地而處,你代入公司嘅角色諗,根本就唔使點諗。
18. 睇返個收入碧丹,主牌TVB當然係最大舊,但亦跌得好快。My TV Super一樣唔多救到。大台網(迫迫青奴呀)太細。你見到其實最有希望嘅,反而係節目發行分銷,即係海外嘢(發行分銷,唔係海外收費電視)。
19. 咁當然,收入乜都假,睇埋利錢(留意呢個同大數嘅純利唔一致,但大約有個迫劈廚咁咯),屌你,你睇主牌下半年蝕到仆街的,而呢度係—未 計—星—美—債—券—的。你話大唔大鑊?但你見到了,迫迫青奴真係幫唔少,恥笑還恥笑,照計都係第時發展重點之一。樓上講嘅節目發行分銷,下半年都係跌好多的,公司好似有講過同大陸有關,但我懶搵。
20. 你問我啦喎,好難有得搞的,電視媒體本身已經係食蕉(都話根本NOW同VIU夾埋應一年蝕廿億,有線就大家知),無線原本老本大把,但時也命也撞著反送中。點睇,主牌嘅cost 都會大減,止咗血先。迫迫青奴可能有得玩下,但短期唔會撐得住成間公司。最簡單,應該都係在個 節目發行分銷度著手,即係,奶多啲共咯,如果人地肯畀你奶的話—喂,呢個世界真係有人以為自己肯奶就得架。共唔共都好,呢個世界肯賣屎忽嘅人多,有價嘅其實都唔係好多。所以你係賣緊嘅,都應該感恩。我是十分認真的
21. 至於買唔買得過?痴撚線咩,睇完篇文都仲要問?
22. 無聊亂諗,其實無線一早應該搵王維基救亡。唔係發神經,其實王維基冇你想像中咁反共,至少當年唔係(而家唔知),都話當年佢係政協,近近地,佢支持填海支持開郊野公園。你諗下,當年佢搞電視時,一早講明唔做新聞,你話為乜?鬼唔知做新聞又型又過癮,但就係令阿爺安心。你見成件事佢都只係啄住梁振英一男子,從冇提升到去反中嘅層次,應該係想用返阿爺去夾梁振英。當然事隔咁多年佢再點諗就唔知。而現實係佢而家搞網購開始見收成,就唔再會同你癲啦。所以都係我呢幾個月反覆講嘅,王維基執返身彩,當初如果搞到電視,而家應該好頭痕。
.net core 發行 在 軟體開發學習資訊分享 Facebook 的最讚貼文
講師 F. Frank Ozgul 是一位軟體架構師,一直在軟體開發行業從事架構師與教師的工作有 12年經驗。
講師擁有英國 Leeds University 機械工程學士學位和軟體工程碩士學位,並一直在傳授 .NET 和 JAVA 的軟體開發技術給銀行軟體開發人員,也在軟體機構教學生做 IT 開發。
本課程是關於使用 Microsoft 和 Docker 公司所提供的最新技術從頭開始建構電子商務 Web 應用程式,這技術基於微服務架構,使得應用程式的微服務全部運行在其獨立容器中,並在需要時通過訊息(messaging)彼此溝通,在其它狀況下 mvc 客戶端將協調微服務的行為。我們將有 5 個微服務運行,包括 mvc 客戶端應用程式。
本課程還教你如何 docker 化你的微服務專案,利用 docker 資料庫容器和建構一個 docker-compose 檔案,以實現微服務容器建立的自動化。
本課程還將教你如何通過基於 IdentityServer4(利用 OAuth2 和 OpenIDConnect 協議)與AspNet Identity 協作建構的認證伺服器微服務來保護你的 web apis 和你的 mvc 客戶端應用程式。
最後,你將學習在某些情況下,可能需要兩個微服務發送訊息給對方取得間接通信。 RabbitMQ伺服器與 MassTransit 、 Autofac Dependency Injection Library 以及一些相關的 nuget 套件協作,將會提供我們一個事件匯流排 ( evnt bus ),通過它我們可以實現這一點。
本課程充滿了最新的想法和技術,這將使你在當今快速發展的技術世界武裝大量的技術。
🔥 udemy 目前 NT360 特價中,請更新優惠折扣碼 ( http://bit.ly/2O0wbOm )
https://softnshare.com/aspnet-core-20-e-commerce-web-site-based-on-microservices-and-docker/
.net core 發行 在 ASP.NET Core 啟用Web.config Transformation | Ray's Notes 的推薦與評價
接下來就來測試吧,發行Debug 組態與Release 組態各建置一次, web.config 應如下方有正確的切換了。 Debug. 1 2 3 4 5 ... <看更多>
.net core 發行 在 Will 保哥的技術交流中心- .NET Core 3.0 將內建#單一檔案發行... 的推薦與評價
NET Core 3.0 將內建#單一檔案發行的功能,第一次執行時會自動解壓縮,毋須再用Warp 封裝了! ✌ 台灣.NET 技術愛好者俱樂部. ... <看更多>
.net core 發行 在 匯入發行設定以發行至IIS - GitHub 的推薦與評價
NET Core web 應用程式。 [!NOTE] 發行設定檔案(* .Publishsettings) 與發行設定檔不同(* . .pubxml) 。 發行設定檔案是在IIS 中建立,然後可以匯入Visual Studio。 ... <看更多>