今日新聞簡陋轉述
澳洲制裁法案進展
澳洲在野工黨尋日以私人草案方式提交International Human Rights and Corruption (Magnitsky Sanctions) Bill 2021,針對竊國者、違反人權嘅加害者或者貪污罪犯("human rights abusers, kleptocrats and corrupt actors")。另一個在野黨綠黨黎緊亦都會動議,要求政府交代立法時間表,亦考慮自己提交草案。
伊朗總統就職
親伊朗最高領袖,保守派前法官Ebrahim Raisi尋日正式就職成為伊朗總統。呢幾日响阿拉伯海域就發生幾件值得關心下嘅新聞,之前有無人機攻擊日本油輪,一個以羅馬利亞船員同另一位前英軍負責船上保安死亡。响口同鼻拗之際,尋日就有油輪响附近嘅海域被疑似伊朗革命衛隊上船企圖劫船,最後因為船員同保安機警,閂個個引擎拖延時間,美國海軍到場嘅時候,「海盜」就走咗。
兩件事其實都係對美國同西方政府一個考驗。
加拿大政府對香港嘅旅遊警示
尋日加拿大政府更新咗香港嘅旅遊警示,包括以下嘅內容,
//Movement Restrictions
On August 1, 2021, the Immigration (Amendment) Ordinance 2021 came into force. Hong Kong authorities may prevent specific individuals from leaving the territory. In the absence of clarifying legislation, these new powers may relate to investigations into an individual, their family or an employer, and criminal and civil matters.
You may not be aware that you are the subject of movement restrictions until you try to leave Hong Kong. It may be difficult to obtain information on movement restrictions from local authorities.//
英國選手唔願要銀牌
尋日奧運男子輕重量級拳擊決賽,英國選手Ben Whittaker輸咗比古巴,只係得到銀牌。不過佢响頒獎嘅時候拒絕掛個獎牌,將個銀牌塞入Ben Whittaker個袋度。
大家唔好以為佢係不滿對手或者賽會,其實佢係唔滿意自己輸咗,第二就係輸,銀牌對佢係無意義。
"I lost a gold, so to me it’s a failure so I am not going to celebrate silver at the moment. I am sure over the years I will look back and see what an achievement it is. You don’t win silver…you lose gold."
Patreon完整原文:
今日有留意嘅新聞
https://bit.ly/3jq5anz
***************************************
📢乞食廣告:文字、時間與心血有價
🥣每日更新乞兒兜:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
***************************************
「international bill of human rights」的推薦目錄:
international bill of human rights 在 民報 Facebook 的最佳解答
【#歐洲之聲】「台海」成了民主國家同盟的集結號(下)
——與謝志偉大使討論拜登訪歐後國際政局
文/田牧 廖天琪(德國)
中共不接受G7峰會、美歐峰會、北約峰會譴責與批判中國的「台海」安全問題、香港民主制度問題、維吾爾人權問題。2021年3月和6月,中共政治局委員、中共外事工作「舵把子」楊潔篪,兩度強調:這是中國的內政,中國政府不承認「少數國家主張的所謂體系和秩序」。
謝大使表示:這些並非是「少數國家所謂的體系和秩序」,而這些原則與規範,本身是來源於二戰後 #國際人權憲章(International Bill of Human Rights),這些以保障人權為目標的國際公約與宣言,......關押維族人,及強迫他們勞動?難道國際社會執行與落實 #國際人權公約 的規則與條文還錯了?
#謝志偉 #中國戰狼
https://www.peoplenews.tw/news/091093b7-9195-47d3-a7f3-6e702deec048
international bill of human rights 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
(轉)
*【就特區政府引用國安法第22條展開大規模拘捕行動的聲明】*
超過50名民主派議員、社運人士及律師,因組織及/或參與已延期的2020年立法會換屆選舉前的初選,而被指控觸犯國家安全法第22條下,有關顛覆罪的罪行。我們 - 即下列堅定相信基本法和法治的聯署人 - 以個人名義,對上述事宜表達深切關注。
在星期三(6日)的記者會上,警務處國家安全處高級警司李桂華證實,警方在是次行動中,在獲得搜查令的情況下搜查了72個處所,當中包括一間律師事務所。國安法第22條訂明,構成罪行的基本元素是「以武力、威脅使用武力或者其他非法手段」。然而當局在記者會上未能完滿地解釋,在該次初選並沒有出現任何暴力或非法行為的情況下,他們是基於甚麼原因引用第22條採取拘捕行動。
任何人不論政見均有權參與公共事務,是《公民與政治權利國際公約》第25條確保的權利,亦受《香港人權法案條例》第21條保護。這項權利,對發展民主管治和法治均發揮關鍵的作用。因此,我們強烈譴責任何打壓和平表達《基本法》賦予市民的基本人權的行為。
《約翰奈斯堡關於國家安全、言論自由和獲取信息自由原則》(U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) 第二條訂明:「一種以國家安全為理由所實行的限制是不合法的,除非其真正的目的和可以 證實的效果是為了保護國家的生存或領土完整免遭武力或武力威脅的侵害, 或者保護其對武力或武力威脅反應的能力,無論這些武力或武力威脅來自外 部,如軍事威脅,還是來自內部,如煽動以暴力推翻政府。」2003年3月,特區政府嘗試按照《基本法》第23條制訂國家安全法時,當時的保安局仍然正面地肯定國家安全立法需符合《約翰奈斯堡原則》。
我們促請特區政府解釋,是否已經放棄《約翰奈斯堡原則》內的適用原則,以及《基本法》訂明保障的基本權利,包括表達和集會的自由。
作為律師,我們同時深切關注搜查律師事務所可能會違反《基本法》第35條訂明法律專業保密的基本權利,即「香港居民有權得到秘密法律諮詢、向法院提起訴訟、選擇律師及時保護自己的合法權益或在法庭上為其代理和獲得司法補救」。我們急切呼籲當局自我約束,確保法律專業保密權得到充份保障,以及全面維護所有香港市民參與政治的權利。
帝理邁
張達明
林洋鋐
蔡頴德
黃耀初
2021年1月7日
【Statement on the Mass Arrest under Article 22 of the National Security Law】
We, the undersigned, as legal practitioners who firmly believe in the Basic Law and the rule of law are deeply concerned that more than 50 pro-democracy lawmakers, activists and lawyers, were arrested yesterday for alleged subversion under Article 22 of The Law of the PRC on Safeguarding National Security in the HKSAR (“NSL”) for organising and/or participating in a primary election for candidates in the 2020 Legislative Council election.
At the press conference on 6 January, Senior Superintendent Steve Li confirmed that the Police had searched 72 premises with a warrant, including a law firm. No satisfactory explanation, however, was given by the authority at the press conference as to why Article 22 of the NSL was invoked in respect of these activities, when that provision expressly requires as an essential element of the offence the use of “force or threat of force or other unlawful means”. The organisation and conduct of the primary election did not involve any violence or other unlawful acts.
The right to participate in public affairs, irrespective of one’s political opinion, is enshrined under Article 25 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights and also protected under article 21 of the Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap.383). It also plays a crucial role in the promotion of democratic governance and is fundamental to the rule of law in Hong Kong. Therefore, we strongly oppose and condemn any attempts to suppress peaceful exercise of the fundamental human rights enshrined in the Basic Law.
We note that back in March 2003, when the NSL was introduced, the Security Bureau still acknowledged the need for the national security legislation to be consistent with the Johannesburg Principles. Principle 2 of the Johannesburg Principles on National Security, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Freedom of Expression and Access to Information (U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/1996/39) provides that “A restriction sought to be justified on the ground of national security is not legitimate unless its genuine purpose and demonstrable effect is to protect a country's existence or its territorial integrity against the use or threat of force, or its capacity to respond to the use or threat of force, whether from an external source, such as a military threat, or an internal source, such as incitement to violent overthrow of the government.”
We call upon the Government to explain whether it has abandoned any due regard to the Johannesburg Principles and the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Basic Law, including the freedom of expression and assembly.
As lawyers, we are further troubled by the search of a law firm, which could violate the fundamental right of residents to legal advice as set out in Article 35 of the Basic Law. We urgently urge the authorities to exercise restraint, to ensure effective protection to legal professional privilege, and to fully uphold the right to political participation for all Hong Kong residents.
CHEUNG T.M. Eric
DALY Mark
LAM Kenneth
TSOI W.T. Michelle
WONG Davyd
Dated this 7 January 2021
international bill of human rights 在 Corporate Human Rights Policy - Facebook 的推薦與評價
internationally recognized human rights as defined by the International Bill of Human Rights. — which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; ... ... <看更多>