繼Chris Wallace被圍吊之後，就連WSJ編輯部都忍唔住出文批評Susan Page響副總統辯論過程入面偏幫民主黨。（激死班左膠，可能又引起新一輪退訂潮）
例如文章指出主持Susan Page堅持彭斯聲稱「美國經濟正在迅猛地回復中」係Fake News，但聯儲局鮑維爾早前先至表示「美國經濟回復之快超乎預期，三四月因疫情而失去的2200萬份職位現已回復一半」
不過可能因為場辯論相對無咁重要同幾悶，所以先無人關注
//In the Pence-Harris debate, moderator Susan Page of USA Today asserted as fact that the “rapid and robust recovery” predicted by the Trump administration is “not happening.” But Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell noted Tuesday that “the recovery has progressed more quickly than generally expected.” The economy has regained half of the 22 million jobs it lost during the March and April lockdowns.
Mr. Pence was right to make his own points rather than debate Ms. Page’s economic misinformation, but when a moderator drops a loaded question or bases a question on a false premise, it stacks the debate. Who cares what a moderator thinks in any case?//
先撇開政治立場唔講，無論係Page定係Wallace，都僭越咗作為辯論主持嘅本份，打斷Trump同Pence嘅發言已唔係在於維持秩序或者協助觀眾釐清事實，而係變成自己一場個人表演騷，就好似球證吹吹下場波自己落場踢埋一份咁；而兩者皆對候選人有明顯喜惡，就更加令件事惡化落去。
正如上文所講，觀眾要睇嘅係總統辯論，唔係你兩條友嘅表演，結果你唔係促進緊場辯論，係破壞緊佢
然後又令我諗起之前個飯民初選論壇，有主持根撚本唔係主持緊個論壇，似係自己做騷多D，咁撚鍾意發明星夢走去拍戲啦！
usa today 立場 在 曹長青：川普與媒體戰爭是真假之戰... | Facebook 的推薦與評價
第一，政治立場的兩極。自川普宣佈參選總統之後，美國左翼媒體（支持民主黨的）就集中火力圍剿川普，主要因為川普的政見，他不僅是典型右翼共和黨的，而且 ... ... <看更多>