Search
《美國到處正在上映中的情景，警察對著已經配合的示威者噴胡椒水！怎麼跟覺醒青年想像中的美國不一樣啊？》
苗博雅說：要是在美國，
檢察官早就調查警察濫權了
要是在美國，
早就成立獨立調查委員會了
要是在美國，
違法施暴的警察早被調查追究了
要是在美國，
警察違法施暴，早就賠償天價了
要是在美國，
新屋嶺私刑早被追究了
要是在美國，
打瞎救護員和記者眼睛的警察，
早就被調查追究了
要是在美國，
警察使用武力指引規則就公布周知了
要是在美國，
警察不能衝進地鐵車廂暴打路人
要是在美國，
超過四分之一的人民走上街頭抗議，高層政客早就引咎辭職了
要是在美國，
人民擁有合法持槍的權利
要是在美國，
遇到拒絕民主的殖民者，
人民早就拿槍革命起義了
一直嚷嚷美國警察也會開槍的人，
曾經為香港發生的不公義發聲嗎？
要講美國，
怎麼只講美國警察會開槍，
其他都不講？
不懂嗎？那真是井底之蛙
裝不懂嗎？
(更新英文版, Updated English Version)
本會於昨日（2/1）發表聲明，表達對警方中止元旦遊行的不滿，隨即引來政府表示對相關言論「深表關注及遺憾」，並「強調公務員不應該肆意批評政府政策，或個別部門的執法行動。」。
本會期望政府能以一視同仁處理公務員團隊的事務。早於去年七月尾，警察員佐級協會曾發信批評張建宗司長就7.21事件的言論是不負責任及妄下定論，並對司長「給予最嚴厲的譴責」。面對警隊批評政府及上司的言論，政府當時並沒有表示警隊不能夠批評政府政策，相反司長卻指須約見相關協會人員會面，並願意就相關說法澄清。同為公務員團隊，政府對警隊及本會的處理手法截然不同，難免令人感到政府有偏頗警隊之嫌。本會對此感到十分遺憾，並希望政府能以一視同仁的原則處理所有牽涉公務員同事的事務。
本會一直秉持政治中立的原則，認同作為受薪於香港市民的公僕團隊，必須以不偏不倚及以專業態度服務市民。政府表示本會不應批評警隊，惟本會對過去半年部分警員的執法行為實在不敢苟同，如故意不展示警員編號、以粗言穢語辱罵市民、記者及議員、於7.21事件上故意不作為、無視武力指引及公然反對上司言論等等。同為公僕團隊，本會必須就警方的行為表達關注，以維護公務員團隊的專業形象，並避免市民對公務員的信任再受打擊。本會同時希望政府能以回應工會的態度，責成警隊恪守其職責及紀律，約束並懲罰有違規行為的警員。
此外，與市民一樣沒有特權的公務員同事，亦切身受到警隊濫權濫捕的影響，如早前有建築署同事執行職務時被警員恐嚇及毆打，元旦遊行亦有所屬分局於附近的消防員同事於銅鑼灣被捕。為保障同事權益，本會責無旁貸，必須就此表達關注。本會在此促請政府尊重公務員同事的意見，設法保障相關權益，並提供渠道讓公務員同事反映受到警隊不合理對待的情況。
本會將繼續無畏無懼，以一顆赤誠之心服務會員，維護公務員團隊恪守政治中立及專業態度服務市民的形象，並以最大努力保障公務員同事的權益。
Our Union issued a statement yesterday (2/1) to express our dissatisfaction with the abrupt halt to the New Year's Day march ordered by the Hong Kong Police Force (the Police) which immediately induced the government’s response, expressing "deep concern and regret" over the relevant remarks, and emphasising that “civil servants should not unscrupulously criticise government policies or enforcement operations by individual departments”.
Our Union expects the Government to handle the matters of civil servants with consistency. Last July, the Junior Police Officers’ Association of the Hong Kong Police Force wrote to “severely condemn” the Chief Secretary (CS) for his “irresponsible remarks and inappropriate conclusion”. The Government, without pointing out that the Police is not in a position to criticise the Government’s policy, offered to arrange a meeting among CS and the concerned body to clarify his remarks. The inconsistent handling for matters amongst civil servant bodies is much regrettable.
Our Union has been upholding the principle of political neutrality. It is our view that publicly funded civil servants should serve members of the public impartially and professionally. Despite the fact that the Government stated that our Union should not be making criticism on Government’s action, we must however reiterate that the action of the Police has been deeply troubling in the last six months. Ranging from concealing the police identification number, allowing verbal assault against members of the public, reporters and Honourable members of the Legislative Council, opting for deliberate inaction on the 721 incident, bluntly disregarding guidelines and openly criticising seniors government officials.
We, our Union, being part of the civil service, must safeguard our professional image and avoid further growth of public mistrust. We therefore urge the Government to firmly, with the same robustness shown in responding to our Union’s activities, steer the Police to strictly adhere to its duty and discipline. Restrain and discipline officers in breach of the regulations, if not illegal.
The rest of the civil service, without any privilege, also suffers from the Police’s abuse of power, including the harassment targeting colleague from the Architectural Services Department at work and the colleague from Fire Services Department being arrested during the New Year's Day march near Causeway Bay. It is our Union’s responsibility to safeguard the rights of fellow colleagues. We hereby urge the Government to respect the opinion of the civil servants and step up the protection of our colleagues’ interest by means of, including but not limited to, setting up a channel for civil servants to lodge complaints against abuse from the Police.
Our Union will continue to serve our members and uphold the political neutrality of the civil service with sincerity and fearlessly. It will be our prime duty to safeguard the rights of our fellow colleagues.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-
新公務員工會 Union for New Civil Servants
Facebook：
https://www.facebook.com/新公務員工會-104692567594100/
Instagram：
https://instagram.com/uncs_uncs
Telegram Channel：
https://t.me/uncs_uncs
#新制公務員 #公務員 #工會 #香港 #Hongkong #uncs #unionfornewcivilservants #union #newcivilservants
林忌：今年香港渡過了一個黑色聖誕節──警察在商場瘋狂截查、拘捕年輕人，四處擾民與阻礙港人休假，其暴力的程度，只能令人聯想起1941年12月24日大日本帝國軍隊入城時的所作所為。在這兩個事件中，最少日軍被定位為佔領者，而港警卻自栩為香港人。
事實上，以往警方都會因應節日遊人眾多而封路；今年港警卻只因為有人叫口號，就拒絕封路，然後就指市民「霸佔道路」然後暴力清場，可說是為濫暴而濫暴。商場更本屬私人地方，警察就假借商場內的「24小時公眾通道」強行闖入，再借此進入其他私人地方，然後以查案為由，濫權不斷胡亂截查入來的市民。更有甚者，警方故意拖延截查，令市民連商場也卻步，其行為十足是幫商場趕客，打擊市民消費意欲，令商場也要關門。
周三（25日），美國《華盛頓郵報》撰文力證港警在處理「反送中」抗爭時的警暴違例。郵報在取得警方的武力指引後，邀請專家研究得出結論，指七成的警暴個案，都涉及違反國際標準的行為，包括聯合國的低致命武力使用指引。當中的違規行為包括故意在人多以至密封的地方射催淚彈，橡膠子彈射頭，以胡椒球槍射入港鐵站，以警棍毆打市民頭部。
自我審查﹑立場偏頗
啲人會叫TVB做CCTVB呢，唔係冇原因嘅。
6月16日見。
Facebook@TheRockGor - https://www.facebook.com/TheRockGor
Instagram@RockGor - https://www.instagram.com/Rock.Gor
