關於 coffee free image ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

#关于BLW

常常都会有妈妈来问我一些关于BLW的问题
其中我最常遇到的
是 "好不容易说服保姆进行BLW"
每次看见这个句子 就让我心惊胆颤
因为很多时候我们做足了功课
意外发生时都可能手足无措
更何况是没有做功课的保姆
很多长辈有错误的观念
例如说Gag的时候大力拍背 用手指抠食物等
这些都是不正确的方式
孩子开始辅食品的第一步
不管是TW喂食粥泥或者BLW自主离乳都好
父母最先应该学的不是变化辅食
而是 【哈姆立克急救法】
请参考 👉https://youtu.be/Xpemid6Mla8

不要觉得喂食粥泥就没有Choke的风险
花生粥里的花生 萝卜丁 马铃薯丁 香蕉 苹果
这些都是高风险 Choke 的食材
TW的宝宝也需要过度 从粥水到固体 的时期
所以也一定要学会急救措施才可以
想要进行BLW 更加一定要先学会急救
这是为了预防 Choke 的发生
可以第一时间进行急救
我们无法把意外发生的几率降为0
但是我们可以降低意外发生的几率

如果你真的是聘请保姆照顾孩子
而保姆在这之前没有任何BLW的知识的话
我真心的建议大家不要为了 BLW 这个名词而执着
就让保姆喂食 父母回家后在进行 FF (Finger Food)
让孩子尽早过度从粥水到固体的阶段即可
我相信每个父母的目标是一致的
就是让孩子可以尽快学会自己吃饭而已
而不是为了让孩子挂着BLW的名义
若干年后孩子上学了
也不会有人在意你的宝贝是BLW还是TW的
所以千万不要为了名义而执着冒险
不管是 BLW 还是 TW+FF
大家的终点都一样
就是早一点和迟一点到达的差别而已
早一点到达没有奖金
迟一点到达没有惩罚
最多就是多抹几个月的地板
别把孩子的生命搭进这个莫名其妙的比赛里
拿孩子的生命赌一个万一
成功了只赢得一个BLW的名义
但是输了会让你后悔一生

Yesterday we experienced every parents worst nightmare!!!!

While it’s still raw, I need to share my story to everyone with babies/children just so people know how quickly a child can choke & stop breathing etc in a matter of seconds/minutes.

Theo nearly died yesterday 😭 because he choked on some food (uk guideline correctly sized finger foods of egg mayo sandwich soldiers & soft melon sticks)
He has eaten this so many times before. Melon & anything on bread are some of his favourite foods.

The reason I am telling you is because most of you know how Theo is such an incredible eater & I always had the attitude “It will never happen to me because I’m so careful” I Always sit with him when he eats, I always chopped his foods into “non choking small sizes”.
I am always so careful, Yet it still happened & We nearly lost our baby.

I was sat next to him while he was eating in his high chair when i accidentally kicked my coffee over. (I think at that moment I must have startled him while he had food in his mouth 😭)
You know what it’s like when a drink spills, you naturally jump out your seat & leg it to the kitchen for some kitchen roll or tea towels etc. It took me seconds to run to the kitchen & back.
I chucked down 5 squares of kitchen roll & that’s all it took time wise. I took my eyes off him for Seconds!!!!!

I heard a muffled sound, I looked over at Theo to find him slumped to the side of his high chair, blue lips & eyes rolled to the back of his head, having a seizure.

Some people don’t know the difference between gagging & choking and think they need to listen for a cough to know their baby is chocking.
THERE WAS NO COUGH TO WARN ME!!!!
Because there was absolutely no air going in or out!!!!

He stopped breathing & his whole body went so blue & lifeless he looked dead 😭 An image that just keeps flashing back over & over in my head, that feeling of complete terror as my heart was ripping into a million pieces as I thought I was going to have to say goodbye to the most precious little soul in my life 💔 a moment I’m not sure I will ever get over.

If it wasn’t for the fact me & Jamie knew first aid & knew to keep going with back blows & chest thrusts until he could breathe . And most importantly called for an ambulance immediately at the start, while I was doing the back blows etc, Jamie was on the phone. I think one more minute & he would have died 😭

The moment I felt his little body give up, followed by blood coming out his mouth was the moment we both completely lost our shit with panic. I think the whole road could hear our desperate screams. Reality kicked in that we could lose him, because nothing was working.

But amazingly we managed to get him back after jamie blew a hard, quick breath into his mouth, that must have dislodged whatever it was.
HE TOOK HIS FIRST BREATH 🙌🏽 after what felt like forever trying to stop him choking. After a few more breaths, He came round all disoriented at first & just wanted to cuddle. Phew....

But Panic wasn’t over 😫 5 minutes later he had another seizure I’m guessing from lack of oxygen. (Both thinking here we go again, screaming at the operator on the phone, begging her to help us)
I had to Put him into the recovery position on the floor & had to sit next to him helplessly while he went in & out on consciousness until the ambulance arrived with some oxygen.

We were taken to hospital & after lots of checks he was so incredibly brave & strong he was sent home later that same night.
The photo is of him totally exhausted having a lovely snooze in daddy’s arms, having his final check before we went home.💙

This isn’t an attention message in any way, because he is absolutely fine now!
it’s purely to make people aware of how easily something like this can happen.
And please please please do not have that same attitude I did that “it won’t happend to me because I’m so careful”
It doesn’t matter how careful you are, accidents still happen & this happened in a matter of seconds!!!!

If your baby was to choke & stop breathing would you honestly hand on heart know what to do???

Because if you don’t....

please take 10mins of your time to read the NHS advice for choking page.
• https://www.nhs.uk/…/pregnancy-and-ba…/helping-choking-baby/

And the short YouTube clips of what to do when a baby/child chokes including CPR
• https://youtu.be/I3pvuYMcPg4
• https://youtu.be/aXaLc-AwX2g

I can honestly say through all the panic & upset that our slight memory of first aid helped us save our baby’s life.

Our story could have been so different but
We feel so incredibly lucky that he is still alive! 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
There must have been a guardian angel watching over us yesterday 💕😇

Please feel free to share this story to all your baby mumma friends, I’ll make it public so people can

***EDIT*** also ask your friends and family that look after your little ones the exact same question above.... what would you do?
If they can’t answer, get them to watch the videos too 😊

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

Ola beautiful humans! I hope you guys are having a wonderful day, enjoy this video :) #vlogmas

LET'S BE FRIENDS !
Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/kelkeltan/?hl=en
Twitter
https://mobile.twitter.com/kelkeltan
Tiktok
@kelkeltan_

BIZ
Business enquiries & PR events
Drop me a mail at :
Kelkeltansocial@gmail.com

SHOP MY BEAUTY PRODUCTS :
https://shopkelkeltan.com/
Refer a friend to get $10 OFF!

PRODUCTS MENTIONED :

FAQ
WHO AM I ?
I'm a Singaporean Chinese living in my homeland Singapore ??! I love makeup, skincare, traveling and etc!? I make beauty and lifestyle videos and upload 2 times every week (MON & FRI). If u like watching such content and if u have ANY questions/opinions/ideas, rmb to comment down below and SUBSCRIBE ❤️

TECH
Vlog camera : Canon G7x mark 2 / iPhone 11 camera
Tutorial camera : Canon 80D
Software for editing : Final Cut Pro X

SKIN TYPE?
I have combination, acne-prone, sensitive skin.

WATCH THIS TO FIND OUT HOW I CLEARED MY ACNE :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uFILZRGW6E&t=795s

BINGE WATCH THESE PLAYLISTS :
COLOURPOP : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzukEsWe4lY&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJe6wkx8UhD0AJVX8GO1l6b6

FENTY BEAUTY : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dEoBzWdRqU&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJd3omgbja4vfIO5Yx5q7DAo

BACK TO BASICS/HOW TO : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2k26Lzpo58&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJeO10rN3Q_OiGwXH_5wf3OL

MAKEUP SWATCHES : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAeIBldLUG8&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJfkwWFHIyTCdMmlwmiSpeuS

FASHION : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dv-X_q9BaNU&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJdbtbj_RTJJ_cqUHSNivLMH

VLOGS : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKoNY3AMIqU&list=PLdOFpCwJxGJdv2XN9e1_IxiKrlpnRLGzq



（＾ω＾）
This video is not sponsored and all opinions are my true and honest feedback.

Songs:
Music by Naomi - The Coffee Shop - https://thmatc.co/?l=993F5C02
Music by Revive - Smoke Up - https://thmatc.co/?l=1B6FF68A
Music by kissmykas - Rest - https://thmatc.co/?l=7C5514C8
Hellothematic
Royalty Free Music for YouTube Videos | Thematic
Free Music for YouTube Content Creators! Thematic connects YouTube creators and music artists, providing curated and pre-cleared music for your YouTube videos for free.

❤歡迎訂閱Free subscribe❤
https://pse.is/submytube
---------
免費網頁設計工具 | Webflow 中文教學-02 | parallax scrolling animation & anchor
實作範例
http://yt-wixpress-org-test.webflow.io/

Parallax image backgrounds, gradients, and video backgrounds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxhbxvUIUd4


✪✪✪FYR 補充資料如下✪✪✪

一頁式購物網站線上申請
https://room404.tw/minigo/


■Wordpress免費架網站教學
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1Sz7nuD5XoCf4-RN13R_l72iXhq0zl2

■Wix免費架網站教學
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1Sz7nuD5XqtWmmGTag3sOeUJf9Q38s6

❤小額贊助頻道 Donate us a cup coffee❤
https://www.paypal.me/178yo

❤歡迎訂閱Free subscribe❤
https://pse.is/submytube
---------
text edit
image
slider
column
container

https://webflow.com/
實作範例
http://yt-wixpress-org-test.webflow.io/


✪✪✪FYR 補充資料如下✪✪✪

一頁式購物網站線上申請
https://room404.tw/minigo/


■Wordpress免費架網站教學
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1Sz7nuD5XoCf4-RN13R_l72iXhq0zl2

■Wix免費架網站教學
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1Sz7nuD5XqtWmmGTag3sOeUJf9Q38s6

❤小額贊助頻道 Donate us a cup coffee❤
https://www.paypal.me/178yo