關於 within spec ，我們在網路上蒐集到這些相關的討論、資訊與評價

[News] ผู้กำกับ Spec Ops: The Line ก่อตั้งสตูดิโอใหม่ EYES OUT เพื่อสร้างเกมสยองขวัญที่เน้นการเล่าเรื่อง
.
คุณ Cory Davis อดีตผู้กำกับ Spec Ops: The Line และคุณ Robin Finck มือกีตาร์จากวงร็อค Nine Inch Nails ได้ร่วมกันประกาศเปิดตัว EYES OUT สตูดิโอเพื่อพัฒนาเกมของพวกเขา
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Doja9yZOBuU&feature=emb_title
EYES OUT | Studio Announcement
.
ซึ่ง EYES OUT ประกอบไปด้วยนักสร้างและนักเล่าเรื่องที่มีความเชื่อในสัมผัสอันทรงพลังที่ผสมผสานกันระหว่างเพลง การเล่าเรื่อง และประสบการณ์อินเตอร์แอ็คทีฟ
.
และโปรเจ็กต์แรกของสตูดิโอจะเป็น "เกมสยองขวัญในอวกาศแบบเล่นคนเดียวที่เน้นองค์ประกอบของการเล่าเรื่อง"
.
ในขณะที่ เหล่าทีมงานนักพัฒนาเกมใน EYES OUT เป็นอดีตนักพัฒนาเกมที่เคยมีส่วนร่วมในเกมต่างๆ อาทิ The Evil Within, Gears of War และอื่นๆ
.
Source: https://www.gematsu.com/2021/08/spec-ops-the-line-director-and-nine-inch-nails-guitarist-launch-new-game-development-studio-eyes-out
-------------------------------
GGKeyStore.com ร้านขายเกมและบัตรเติมเกม ราคาถูก รับของทันที เปิด 24 ชั่วโมง เชื่อถือได้ 100% สมาชิกกว่า 50,000 คน ขายไปแล้วกว่า 100,000 คีย์
-------------------------------
Battlefield V (Origin) แจกฟรีสำหรับสมาชิก Prime Gaming ดูวิธีรับที่นี่ - https://bit.ly/3yrB3mk

📜 [專欄新文章] Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth

✍️ 田少谷 Shao

📥 歡迎投稿： https://medium.com/taipei-ethereum-meetup #徵技術分享文 #使用心得 #教學文 #medium

Once again the game-changing DEX 🦄 👑

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Outline

0. Intro1. Uniswap & AMM recap2. Ticks 3. Concentrated liquidity4. Range orders: reversible limit orders5. Impacts of v36. Conclusion

0. Intro

The announcement of Uniswap v3 is no doubt one of the most exciting news in the DeFi place recently 🔥🔥🔥

While most have talked about the impact v3 can potentially bring on the market, seldom explain the delicate implementation techniques to realize all those amazing features, such as concentrated liquidity, limit-order-like range orders, etc.

Since I’ve covered Uniswap v1 & v2 (if you happen to know Mandarin, here are v1 & v2), there’s no reason for me to not cover v3 as well ✅

Thus, this article aims to guide readers through Uniswap v3, based on their official whitepaper and examples made on the announcement page. However, one needs not to be an engineer, as not many codes are involved, nor a math major, as the math involved is definitely taught in your high school, to fully understand the following content 😊😊😊

If you really make it through but still don’t get shxt, feedbacks are welcomed! 🙏

There should be another article focusing on the codebase, so stay tuned and let’s get started with some background noise!

1. Uniswap & AMM recap

Before diving in, we have to first recap the uniqueness of Uniswap and compare it to traditional order book exchanges.

Uniswap v1 & v2 are a kind of AMMs (automated market marker) that follow the constant product equation x * y = k, with x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y in a pool and k as a constant.

Comparing to order book exchanges, AMMs, such as the previous versions of Uniswap, offer quite a distinct user experience:

AMMs have pricing functions that offer the price for the two tokens, which make their users always price takers, while users of order book exchanges can be both makers or takers.

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have infinite liquidity¹, while order book exchanges don’t. The liquidity of Uniswap v1 & v2 is provided throughout the price range [0,∞]².

Uniswap as well as most AMMs have price slippage³ and it’s due to the pricing function, while there isn’t always price slippage on order book exchanges as long as an order is fulfilled within one tick.

In an order book, each price (whether in green or red) is a tick. Image source: https://ftx.com/trade/BTC-PERP

¹ though the price gets worse over time; AMM of constant sum such as mStable does not have infinite liquidity

² the range is in fact [-∞,∞], while a price in most cases won’t be negative

³ AMM of constant sum does not have price slippage

2. Tick

The whole innovation of Uniswap v3 starts from ticks.

For those unfamiliar with what is a tick:

Source: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tick.asp

By slicing the price range [0,∞] into numerous granular ticks, trading on v3 is highly similar to trading on order book exchanges, with only three differences:

The price range of each tick is predefined by the system instead of being proposed by users.

Trades that happen within a tick still follows the pricing function of the AMM, while the equation has to be updated once the price crosses the tick.

Orders can be executed with any price within the price range, instead of being fulfilled at the same one price on order book exchanges.

With the tick design, Uniswap v3 possesses most of the merits of both AMM and an order book exchange! 💯💯💯

So, how is the price range of a tick decided?

This question is actually somewhat related to the tick explanation above: the minimum tick size for stocks trading above 1$ is one cent.

The underlying meaning of a tick size traditionally being one cent is that one cent (1% of 1$) is the basis point of price changes between ticks, ex: 1.02 — 1.01 = 0.1.

Uniswap v3 employs a similar idea: compared to the previous/next price, the price change should always be 0.01% = 1 basis point.

However, notice the difference is that in the traditional basis point, the price change is defined with subtraction, while here in Uniswap it’s division.

This is how price ranges of ticks are decided⁴:

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

With the above equation, the tick/price range can be recorded in the index form [i, i+1], instead of some crazy numbers such as 1.0001¹⁰⁰ = 1.0100496621.

As each price is the multiplication of 1.0001 of the previous price, the price change is always 1.0001 — 1 = 0.0001 = 0.01%.

For example, when i=1, p(1) = 1.0001; when i=2, p(2) = 1.00020001.

p(2) / p(1) = 1.00020001 / 1.0001 = 1.0001

See the connection between the traditional basis point 1 cent (=1% of 1$) and Uniswap v3’s basis point 0.01%?

Image source: https://tenor.com/view/coin-master-cool-gif-19748052

But sir, are prices really granular enough? There are many shitcoins with prices less than 0.000001$. Will such prices be covered as well?

Price range: max & min

To know if an extremely small price is covered or not, we have to figure out the max & min price range of v3 by looking into the spec: there is a int24 tick state variable in UniswapV3Pool.sol.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf

The reason for a signed integer int instead of an uint is that negative power represents prices less than 1 but greater than 0.

24 bits can cover the range between 1.0001 ^ (2²³ — 1) and 1.0001 ^ -(2)²³. Even Google cannot calculate such numbers, so allow me to offer smaller values to have a rough idea of the whole price range:

1.0001 ^ (2¹⁸) = 242,214,459,604.341

1.0001 ^ -(2¹⁷) = 0.000002031888943

I think it’s safe to say that with a int24 the range can cover > 99.99% of the prices of all assets in the universe 👌

⁴ For implementation concern, however, a square root is added to both sides of the equation.

How about finding out which tick does a price belong to?

Tick index from price

The answer to this question is rather easy, as we know that p(i) = 1.0001^i, simply takes a log with base 1.0001 on both sides of the equation⁴:

Image source: https://www.codecogs.com/latex/eqneditor.php

Let’s try this out, say we wanna find out the tick index of 1000000.

Image source: https://ncalculators.com/number-conversion/log-logarithm-calculator.htm

Now, 1.0001¹³⁸¹⁶² = 999,998.678087146. Voila!

⁵ This formula is also slightly modified to fit the real implementation usage.

3. Concentrated liquidity

Now that we know how ticks and price ranges are decided, let’s talk about how orders are executed in a tick, what is concentrated liquidity and how it enables v3 to compete with stablecoin-specialized DEXs (decentralized exchange), such as Curve, by improving the capital efficiency.

Concentrated liquidity means LPs (liquidity providers) can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish, which causes the liquidity to be imbalanced in ticks.

As each tick has a different liquidity depth, the corresponding pricing function x * y = k also won’t be the same!

Each tick has its own liquidity depth. Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Mmm… examples are always helpful for abstract descriptions 😂

Say the original pricing function is 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k), with the price of X token 1000 / 100 = 10 and we’re now in the price range [9.08, 11.08].

If the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is the same as [9.08, 11.08], we don’t have to modify the pricing function if the price goes from 10 to 11.08, which is the boundary between two ticks.

The price of X is 1052.63 / 95 = 11.08 when the equation is 1052.63 * 95 = 100000.

However, if the liquidity of the price range [11.08, 13.08] is two times that of the current range [9.08, 11.08], balances of x and y should be doubled, which makes the equation become 2105.26 * 220 = 400000, which is (1052.63 * 2) * (110 * 2) = (100000 * 2 * 2).

We can observe the following two points from the above example:

Trades always follow the pricing function x * y = k, while once the price crosses the current price range/tick, the liquidity/equation has to be updated.

√(x * y) = √k = L is how we represent the liquidity, as I say the liquidity of x * y = 400000 is two times the liquidity of x * y = 100000, as √(400000 / 100000) = 2.

What’s more, compared to liquidity on v1 & v2 is always spread across [0,∞], liquidity on v3 can be concentrated within certain price ranges and thus results in higher capital efficiency from traders’ swapping fees!

Let’s say if I provide liquidity in the range [1200, 2800], the capital efficiency will then be 4.24x higher than v2 with the range [0,∞] 😮😮😮 There’s a capital efficiency comparison calculator, make sure to try it out!

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

It’s worth noticing that the concept of concentrated liquidity was proposed and already implemented by Kyper, prior to Uniswap, which is called Automated Price Reserve in their case.⁵

⁶ Thanks to Yenwen Feng for the information.

4. Range orders: reversible limit orders

As explained in the above section, LPs of v3 can provide liquidity to any price range/tick at their wish. Depending on the current price and the targeted price range, there are three scenarios:

current price < the targeted price range

current price > the targeted price range

current price belongs to the targeted price range

The first two scenarios are called range orders. They have unique characteristics and are essentially fee-earning reversible limit orders, which will be explained later.

The last case is the exact same liquidity providing mechanism as the previous versions: LPs provide liquidity in both tokens of the same value (= amount * price).

There’s also an identical product to the case: grid trading, a very powerful investment tool for a time of consolidation. Dunno what’s grid trading? Check out Binance’s explanation on this, as this topic won’t be covered!

In fact, LPs of Uniswap v1 & v2 are grid trading with a range of [0,∞] and the entry price as the baseline.

Range orders

To understand range orders, we’d have to first revisit how price is discovered on Uniswap with the equation x * y = k, for x & y stand for the amount of two tokens X and Y and k as a constant.

The price of X compared to Y is y / x, which means how many Y one can get for 1 unit of X, and vice versa the price of Y compared to X is x / y.

For the price of X to go up, y has to increase and x decrease.

With this pricing mechanism in mind, it’s example time!

Say an LP plans to place liquidity in the price range [15.625, 17.313], higher than the current price of X 10, when 100(x) * 1000(y) = 100000(k).

The price of X is 1250 / 80 = 15.625 when the equation is 80 * 1250 = 100000.

The price of X is 1315.789 / 76 = 17.313 when the equation is 76 * 1315.789 = 100000.

If now the price of X reaches 15.625, the only way for the price of X to go even higher is to further increase y and decrease x, which means exchanging a certain amount of X for Y.

Thus, to provide liquidity in the range [15.625, 17.313], an LP needs only to prepare 80 — 76 = 4 of X. If the price exceeds 17.313, all 4 X of the LP is swapped into 1315.789 — 1250 = 65.798 Y, and then the LP has nothing more to do with the pool, as his/her liquidity is drained.

What if the price stays in the range? It’s exactly what LPs would love to see, as they can earn swapping fees for all transactions in the range! Also, the balance of X will swing between [76, 80] and the balance of Y between [1250, 1315.789].

This might not be obvious, but the example above shows an interesting insight: if the liquidity of one token is provided, only when the token becomes more valuable will it be exchanged for the less valuable one.

…wut? 🤔

Remember that if 4 X is provided within [15.625, 17.313], only when the price of X goes up from 15.625 to 17.313 is 4 X gradually swapped into Y, the less valuable one!

What if the price of X drops back immediately after reaching 17.313? As X becomes less valuable, others are going to exchange Y for X.

The below image illustrates the scenario of DAI/USDC pair with a price range of [1.001, 1.002] well: the pool is always composed entirely of one token on both sides of the tick, while in the middle 1.001499⁶ is of both tokens.

Image source: https://uniswap.org/blog/uniswap-v3/

Similarly, to provide liquidity in a price range < current price, an LP has to prepare a certain amount of Y for others to exchange Y for X within the range.

To wrap up such an interesting feature, we know that:

Only one token is required for range orders.

Only when the current price is within the range of the range order can LP earn trading fees. This is the main reason why most people believe LPs of v3 have to monitor the price more actively to maximize their income, which also means that LPs of v3 have become arbitrageurs 🤯

I will be discussing more the impacts of v3 in 5. Impacts of v3.

⁷ 1.001499988 = √(1.0001 * 1.0002) is the geometric mean of 1.0001 and 1.0002. The implication is that the geometric mean of two prices is the average execution price within the range of the two prices.

Reversible limit orders

As the example in the last section demonstrates, if there is 4 X in range [15.625, 17.313], the 4 X will be completely converted into 65.798 Y when the price goes over 17.313.

We all know that a price can stay in a wide range such as [10, 11] for quite some time, while it’s unlikely so in a narrow range such as [15.625, 15.626].

Thus, if an LP provides liquidity in [15.625, 15.626], we can expect that once the price of X goes over 15.625 and immediately also 15.626, and does not drop back, all X are then forever converted into Y.

The concept of having a targeted price and the order will be executed after the price is crossed is exactly the concept of limit orders! The only difference is that if the range of a range order is not narrow enough, it’s highly possible that the conversion of tokens will be reverted once the price falls back to the range.

As price ranges follow the equation p(i) = 1.0001 ^ i, the range can be quite narrow and a range order can thus effectively serve as a limit order:

When i = 27490, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹⁰ = 15.6248.⁸

When i = 27491, 1.0001²⁷⁴⁹¹ = 15.6264.⁸

A range of 0.0016 is not THAT narrow but can certainly satisfy most limit order use cases!

⁸ As mentioned previously in note #4, there is a square root in the equation of the price and index, thus the numbers here are for explantion only.

5. Impacts of v3

Higher capital efficiency, LPs become arbitrageurs… as v3 has made tons of radical changes, I’d like to summarize my personal takes of the impacts of v3:

Higher capital efficiency makes one of the most frequently considered indices in DeFi: TVL, total value locked, becomes less meaningful, as 1$ on Uniswap v3 might have the same effect as 100$ or even 2000$ on v2.

The ease of spot exchanging between spot exchanges used to be a huge advantage of spot markets over derivative markets. As LPs will take up the role of arbitrageurs and arbitraging is more likely to happen on v3 itself other than between DEXs, this gap is narrowed … to what extent? No idea though.

LP strategies and the aggregation of NFT of Uniswap v3 liquidity token are becoming the blue ocean for new DeFi startups: see Visor and Lixir. In fact, this might be the turning point for both DeFi and NFT: the two main reasons of blockchain going mainstream now come to the alignment of interest: solving the $$ problem 😏😏😏

In the right venue, which means a place where transaction fees are low enough, such as Optimism, we might see Algo trading firms coming in to share the market of designing LP strategies on Uniswap v3, as I believe Algo trading is way stronger than on-chain strategies or DAO voting to add liquidity that sort of thing.

After reading this article by Parsec.finance: The Dex to Rule Them All, I cannot help but wonder: maybe there is going to be centralized crypto exchanges adopting v3’s approach. The reason is that since orders of LPs in the same tick are executed pro-rata, the endless front-running speeding-competition issue in the Algo trading world, to some degree, is… solved? 🤔

Anyway, personal opinions can be biased and seriously wrong 🙈 I’m merely throwing out a sprat to catch a whale. Having a different voice? Leave your comment down below!

6. Conclusion

That was kinda tough, isn’t it? Glad you make it through here 🥂🥂🥂

There are actually many more details and also a huge section of Oracle yet to be covered. However, since this article is more about features and targeting normal DeFi users, I’ll leave those to the next one; hope there is one 😅

If you have any doubt or find any mistake, please feel free to reach out to me and I’d try to reply AFAP!

Stay tuned and in the meantime let’s wait and see how Uniswap v3 is again pioneering the innovation of DeFi 🌟

Uniswap v3 Features Explained in Depth was originally published in Taipei Ethereum Meetup on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

👏 歡迎轉載分享鼓掌

ยืนยัน ! มือถือ ASUS และ Lenovo Legion รุ่นล่าสุดจะใช้ชิป Snapdragon 865 Plus
Confirmation! The latest ASUS and Lenovo Legion mobile phone will use Snapdragon 865 Plus chips.Translated
ยืนยัน ! มือถือ ASUS และ Lenovo Legion รุ่นล่าสุดจะใช้ชิป Snapdragon 865 Plus
.
ASUS ได้ประกาศว่าโทรศัพท์มือถือ ASUS ROG Phone III จะเป็นมือถือรุ่นแรกของ ASUS ที่ใช้ชิป Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus และ Lenovo Legion ยืนยันว่ากำลังพัฒนามือถือ 5G สำหรับเกมการเล่นเกมโดยใช้ชิปดังกล่าวเช่นเดียวกัน
.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus มีคุณสมบัติเบื้องต้นว่า GPU จะทำงานเร็วกว่า 865 แบบธรรมดาถึง 10% และมือถือที่ใช้ชิป 865 plus จะสามารถรองรับฟีเจอร์ Snapdragon Elite Gaming ซึ่งช่วยปรับปรุงภาพเกมให้ลื่นไหล กับมีภาพ HDR ที่สวยงามขึ้น
.
นอกจากนี้ Snapdragon 865 Plus ได้ใช้ Kryo 585 CPU ซึ่งทำให้การประมวลผลของเครื่องเร็วกว่า 865 แบบธรรมดาถึง 10% แต่อย่างไรก็ตาม ชิปดังกล่าวจะยังไม่มีวิทยุ 5G ในตัว แต่จะสามารถจับคู่กับ X55 modem-RF เพื่อรองรับความเร็วในการดาวน์โหลดสูงสุดที่ 7.5 Gbps และ 3 Gbps ขึ้นไปแทน
.
Qualcomm กล่าวว่าจะมีการเปิดตัวโทรศัพท์มือถือที่ใช้ Snapdragon 865 Plus อีกมากมายภายในช่วงไตรมาสที่สามของปี 2020 จนถึงตอนนั้น ถ้าหากมีข่าวสารมือถือที่น่าสนใจ ทางทีมงาน GamingDose จะรายงานกันต่อไปครับ
.
ที่มา: https://www.engadget.com/snapdragon-865-plus-5g-gaming-spec…
.
#ข่าวเกม #GamingDose #Snapdragon
Confirmation! The latest ASUS and Lenovo Legion mobile phone will use Snapdragon 865 Plus chips.
.
ASUSUS has announced that ASUS ROG Phone III will be the first mobile of ASUS to use Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus and Lenovo Legion confirms that they are developing 5 G mobile phones for gaming games using such chips.
.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus has preliminary features that GPU will run faster than 865 % of normal to 10 % and 865 plus chip mobile phones can support Snapdragon Elite Gaming feature which helps to smooth the game image. With more beautiful HDR pics
.
Also, Snapdragon 865 Plus uses Kryo 585 CPU, which makes 10 % faster processing of regular 865 % to 10 % but however, the chip will not have built-in 5 G radio, but will be able to match it. X55 modem-RF to support maximum download speed of 7.5 Gbps and 3 Gbps up instead.
.
Qualcomm says Snapdragon 865 Plus mobile phones will be launched within the third quarter of 2020 until then. If there is any interesting mobile news, GamingDose team will continue to report.
.
Source: https://www.engadget.com/snapdragon-865-plus-5g-gaming-specs-availability-rog-phone-3-133017160.html
.
#ข่าวเกม #GamingDose #SnapdragonTranslated

Showcase of All Revolver Weapons, Reload Animations and Sounds
1975-2021

Gun Fight 1975
outlaw 1976
Sewer Sam 1983
High Noon 1984
Gun.Smoke 1985
War of the Dead 1987
Wild West World 1990
Dirty Harry 1990
The Lone Ranger 1991
alone in the dark 1992.
Virtua Cop 2 1995
Powerslave 1996
Outlaws 1997
Resident Evil: Director's Cut 1997
half life 1998
metal gear solid 1998
Duke Nukem: Zero Hour 1999
Tomb Raider: Chronicles 2000
Counter-Strike 2000
Silent Hill 2 2001
Alone in the Dark: The New Nightmare 2001
serious sam the first encounter 2001
Resident Evil 0 2002
Die Hard: Vendetta 2002
medal of honor allied assault 2002
prohect o.g.i 2 covert strike 2003
XIII 2003
True Crime: Streets of LA 2003
Battlefield Vietnam 2004
Resident Evil: Outbreak 2004
Serious Sam Advance 2004
half life 2 2004
Red Dead Revolver 2004
Total Overdose 2005
Call of Duty 2 2005
Gun 2005
Call of Juarez 2005
The History Channel: Civil War - A Nation Divided 2006
Black 2006
Killzone: Liberation 2006
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas 2006
crossfire 2007
team fortress 2 2007
Soldier of Fortune: Payback 2007
Battlefield: Bad Company 2008
Far Cry 2 2008
The Royal Marines Commando 2008
Call of Duty: World at War 2008
fallout 3 2008
Killzone 2 2009
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood 2009
killing floor 2009
borderlands 2 2009
call of duty modern of warfare 2 2009
Battlefield Bad Company 2 2010
fallout new vegas 2010
firearms source 2010
metro 2033 2010
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2010
Red Dead Redemption 2010
BioShock 2 2010
RAGE 2011
dead island 2011
Battlefield 3 2011
Rusty Hearts 2011
Dino D-Day 2011
Resistance 3 2011
call of duty modern of warfare 3 2011
Counter Strike Global 2012
Far Cry 3 2012
Max Payne 3 2012
black mesa 2012
Spec Ops: The Line 2012
Battlefield 4 2013
Shadow Warrior 2013
Metro: Last Light 2013
call of juarez gunslinger 2013
bioshock infinite 2013
Metro Redux 2014
destiny 2014
the evil within 2014
Alien: Isolation 2014
Far Cry 4 2014
Fallout 4 2015
Survarium 2015
Battlefield Hardline 2015
Rainbow Six Siege 2015
Dying Light 2015
ZULA 2016
Shadow Warrior 2 2016
battlefiled 1 2016
overwatch 2016
Titanfall 2 2016
ghost in the shell first assault 2006
Black Squad 2017
snirer elite 4 2017
pubg 2017
tannenberg 2017
Rising Storm 2: Vietnam 2017
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 2018
HUNT SHOWDOWN 2018
Red Dead Redemption II 2018
Ironsight 2018
Ion Fury 2018
Pathologic 2 2019
Call of Duty : Modern Warfare 2019
Metro Exodus 2019
The Outer Worlds 2019
control 2019
Zombie Army 4: Dead War 2020
The Last of Us Part 2 2020
Valorant 2020
Cyberpunk2077 2020
Enlisted 2021
Ready or Not 2021
Back 4 Blood 2021
Resident Evil Village 2021
Shadow Warrior 3 2021
Scorn 2021

👉 Don't Forget : Like 👍 , Share 💌 , Comment 💬

1975 0:08
1976 0:21
1983 0:28
1984 0:37
1985 0:46
1999 0:55
1991 01:06
1992 01:15
1995 01:25
1996 01:35
1997 01:48
1998 02:02
1999 02:10
2001 02:22
2002 02:38
2003 03:03
2004 03:28
2005 03:51
2006 04:20
2007 05:04
2008 05:36
2009 06:05
2010 06:47
2011 07:50
2012 08:48
2013 09:47
2014 10:36
2015 11:18
2016 12:09
2017 13:24
2018 14:34
2019 16:35
2020 17:49
2021 19:13

The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 and the OnePlus 6T were released within the same time globally, has very similar specs and almost the same
screen size. So which would be the better phone then?

Full Detailed Spec Comparison:-
https://bit.ly/2DM584O

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 Video Review:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd92Liabedo

OnePlus 6T Video Review:-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDEzFnJHhts

Get The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 At The Official Lazada Site Below:-
https://bit.ly/2TUptMh

Get The OnePlus 6T At The Official Lazada Site Below:-
https://bit.ly/2XaBHlF

My Desk Setup 2018: http://bit.ly/2oGT8dd

My YouTube Gear 2017: http://bit.ly/2so8Hrr

Support Adam Lobo TV :-
Donate to the channel: http://paypal.me/adamlobo
Become a monthly contributor on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/adamlobo


Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/adamlob0/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/adam_lobo
Facebook: www.fb.com/adamlobotv
Snapchat: @adamlob0
Adam Lobo TV: www.adamlobo.tv
Adam Lobo Official Profile Website: www.adamlobo.com
Dragon Red Band Official Website: www.dragonred.com

#adamlobotv #xiaomimimix3 #oneplus6t

SS模擬器 04:53
PC-E CD模擬器 09:30
DreamCast模擬器 14:50
PSP模擬器 20:17
PS2模擬器 25:12
WII模擬器 31:47
Androld模擬器 32:58
PC/Steam 35:15
結語: 48:15

買了不後悔~只是非常貴

The GPD Win 2 is a Windows-based handheld computer that is the successor to the GPD Win. It is manufactured by Chinese company GamePad Digital, and crowdfunded just as its predecessor was. Announced in first-quarter 2017, the crowdfunding campaign officially kicked off on January 15, 2018, and quickly surpassed its goal. Within days, it reached $1.8 million USD funding off of a stated $100,000 goal. It was released in May 2018.

The GPD Win 2 is rated to run AAA-spec video games, and to better run newer generation video game emulators.