#BALMUDA The Cleaner無線吸塵器 開箱
https://bit.ly/38LT8ju
今天不聊包包精品,來聊居家精品,身為整理收納狂,雖然很愛買,但是也很愛收,而且隨時隨地吸地,來家裡比較熟的好朋友每次都會叫我好好坐著聊天不要再走動,因為只要看到有小毛屑、亂丟的玩具我就是會渾身不對勁,要把它收好這樣!
不過也因為有這個潔癖,所以我們家滿滿的白牆白門白色系裝潢,到現在都還存活著,沒有被小孩侵佔(像是畫畫、貼貼紙等等)。。。默默覺得滿意。
所以說,對於視覺的潔癖,也絕對是有的,因為這樣,特別喜歡講究Less is more,Less is better,來自日本的精品家電BALMUDA,從蒸氣烤麵包機還有風扇就好喜歡,現在又推出了BALMUDA The Cleaner無線吸塵器,說說身為一個有點潔癖的整理收納狂,幾乎每分每秒都隨手揣著一個吸塵器的人,怎麼可以錯過!
使用了一個月,擺在旁邊充電看著它融入裝潢也很滿意,太美,而且真心好用,直接拍了影片開箱給大家看!希望喜歡唷~ #給視覺也潔癖的你
#BalmudaTheCleaner無線吸塵器 #百慕達無線吸塵器 #獨特懸浮技術 #360度旋轉結構 #雙重毛刷
2021/9/15-9/30超超早鳥官網預購活動 價格:13,888
2021/10/1-10/7早鳥價 價格:14,888
2021/10/8-10/14最後最後早鳥 價格:14,888
(未來上市定價:19,999)
FB 粉絲團、YOUTUBE頻道🔍Nikki小閃
Ins、小紅書🔍nikkichien
Blog🔍http://nikita57.blogspot.com
同時也有155部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過921的網紅Nikki小閃,也在其Youtube影片中提到,#BALMUDA The Cleaner無線吸塵器 開箱 https://bit.ly/38LT8ju 今天不聊包包精品,來聊居家精品,身為整理收納狂,雖然很愛買,但是也很愛收,而且隨時隨地吸地,來家裡比較熟的好朋友每次都會叫我好好坐著聊天不要再走動,因為只要看到有小毛屑、亂丟的玩具我...
「less is more書」的推薦目錄:
- 關於less is more書 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於less is more書 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於less is more書 在 經濟日報 Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於less is more書 在 Nikki小閃 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於less is more書 在 汪詩敏 Sylvia Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於less is more書 在 極簡姐姐 巧玉 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於less is more書 在 [字彙] Less is more - 精華區Eng-Class - 批踢踢實業坊 的評價
- 關於less is more書 在 極簡主義Less is more 的評價
- 關於less is more書 在 解读52本经典好书46.《少即是多》:北欧自由生活意见 ... 的評價
less is more書 在 黃浩銘 Raphael Wong Facebook 的精選貼文
毋忘五大訴求 公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
(案件編號:DCCC 535/2020)
——————————————————
「毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘,即訂閱Patreon:
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————
胡法官雅文閣下:
2012年,我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」,述說對普選的盼望,批評公安惡法不義,並因公民抗命的緣故,甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說,如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除,惡法沒有消失,我依然會一如故我,公民抗命,並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日,普選仍然遙遙無期,我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判,但只是短短7年,已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命,反對暴政。今日,我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪,我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫,但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情,讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。
暴力之濫觴
在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際,我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中,但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行,幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭,抗議不義惡法,今日關於10月20日的案件,亦是如此。可能有人會問,政府已在6月暫緩修例,更在9月正式撤回修例,我等仍然繼續示威,豈非無理取鬧?我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」(Justice delayed is justice denied)這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭,和平表達不滿的時候,林鄭政府沒有理睬,反而獨行獨斷,粗暴踐踏港人的意願,結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗,甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後,所謂暫緩撤回,已經微不足道,我們只是更加清楚:沒有民主,就連基本人權都不會擁有!
在本案之中,雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為,但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件,相信在控方及法庭眼中,案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上,如此,我有必要問:如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉,人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律,試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢?如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦,那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢?如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗,那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言?真正且經常發生的暴力,是漠視人民訴求的暴力,是踐踏人民意見的暴力,是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力,痛恨暴力的人,不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗,又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責,那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢?
社會之病根
對於法庭而言,可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂,務必追究違法者個人責任。然而,治亂治其本源,醫病醫其病根,我雖然公民抗命,刻意違法,控方把我帶上法庭,但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情,並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成,社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身,而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理,但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法,就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後,2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。
如果不希望社會動亂,就必須正本清源,逐步落實「五大訴求」,從根本上改革,挽回民心。2019年反修例運動,其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已,縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起,但我必須澄清,兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選,人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中,接近300萬人投票,民主派大勝,奪得17個區議會主導權,這就是整個反修例運動的民意,民意就是反對政府決策,反對制度暴力,反對推行惡法,不容爭辯,不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀,多次提醒政府撤回修法,並從根本上改革制度,而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今,法庭對我們施加重刑,其實只不過是懲罰民意,將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內,甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中,窒礙表達自由。
堅持之重要
大運動過後的大鎮壓,使我們失去《蘋果日報》,失去教協,失去民陣,不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中,不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調,新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮,公民社會受到沈重打擊,我亦失去不少摯友,有感傷孤獨的時候,但我仍然相信,2019年香港人的信念,以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政,抵制惡法,展現我們眾志成城;我不會忘記人潮紅海,讓道救護車,展現我們文明精神;我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政,捨身成仁,展現我們膽色勇氣;我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人,展現我們彼此關懷;我不會忘記「五大訴求」,不會忘記2019年區議會選舉,展現我們有理有節。
法官閣下,我對於當日的所作所為,不感羞恥,毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路,與戰友同繫一獄,實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石,將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制,隨時變成政治工具掃除異見,因此爭取民主普選,建設真正法治,追求公平正義,仍然是我的理想。在這條路上,如有必要,我仍然會公民抗命,正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明(Lord Hoffmann)所言,發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統,歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望,曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念,在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷,活在愛和真實之中。
最後,如9年前一樣,我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說:「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力,來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量,來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧,我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律,因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧,我們仍然愛你們。」(We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.)
願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安,與我和我一家同在,與法官閣下同在,與香港人同在。沒有暴徒,只有暴政;五大訴求,缺一不可!願榮耀歸上帝,榮光歸人民!
第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日
Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)
Your Honour Judge Woodcock
In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.
The roots of violence
At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!
In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?
The roots of society's problems
From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.
If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.
The importance of persistence
As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.
Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.
Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."
Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!
The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021
less is more書 在 經濟日報 Facebook 的最讚貼文
【#名人選書📚】Less is More!施光訓:擁有越多、得到越少
2020年一場全球大疫,劇烈改變人類原本的生活軌道。中信金融管理學院校長施光訓重新閱讀了法國知名隨筆作家洛羅的《How to Live More with Less:理想的簡單生活》,更加體悟到擁有越多、得到的越少,簡單才能帶來意義與美好。
🔺我們曾經關注的事物真的重要嗎?
20世紀30年代美國大蕭條時期,金錢比不上格調重要,因為差不多所有家庭都一貧如洗,展現不同家庭高下之別的不再是金錢財富,而是談吐、教養、文化、道德觀、與對「好東西」的品味。
🔺調整生活態度
「我們清楚認識到,減省節約的目的,不是要苛待自己,要去儉省的並不是金錢,而是當我們學會明確需求,求精求實,就可以擺脫消費主義加諸在身上的龐雜累贅,節約下來的就是時間,而時間才是你最匱乏,最渴求的資源。
『今天』是我們最寶貴的財富,一日光陰比一座金山寶貴,如果你憎惡死亡,就應該熱愛今天!」
(👆這一句特別發人省思啊!!!)
看全文:https://bit.ly/3jXS3dI
📷 中金院╱提供
less is more書 在 Nikki小閃 Youtube 的最讚貼文
#BALMUDA The Cleaner無線吸塵器 開箱
https://bit.ly/38LT8ju
今天不聊包包精品,來聊居家精品,身為整理收納狂,雖然很愛買,但是也很愛收,而且隨時隨地吸地,來家裡比較熟的好朋友每次都會叫我好好坐著聊天不要再走動,因為只要看到有小毛屑、亂丟的玩具我就是會渾身不對勁,要把它收好這樣!
不過也因為有這個潔癖,所以我們家滿滿的白牆白門白色系裝潢,到現在都還存活著,沒有被小孩侵佔(像是畫畫、貼貼紙等等)。。。默默覺得滿意。
所以說,對於視覺的潔癖,也絕對是有的,因為這樣,特別喜歡講究Less is more,Less is better,來自日本的精品家電BALMUDA,從蒸氣烤麵包機還有風扇就好喜歡,現在又推出了BALMUDA The Cleaner無線吸塵器,說說身為一個有點潔癖的整理收納狂,幾乎每分每秒都隨手揣著一個吸塵器的人,怎麼可以錯過!
使用了一個月,擺在旁邊充電看著它融入裝潢也很滿意,太美,而且真心好用,直接拍了影片開箱給大家看!希望喜歡唷~ #給視覺也潔癖的你
#BalmudaTheCleaner無線吸塵器 #百慕達無線吸塵器 #獨特懸浮技術 #360度旋轉結構 #雙重毛刷
2021/9/15-9/30 超超早鳥官網預購活動 價格:13,888
2021/10/1-10/7 早鳥價 價格:14,888
2021/10/8-10/14 最後早鳥 吸塵器價格:14,888
(未來上市定價:19,999)
看完也別忘了訂閱、開啟小鈴鐺,這就是給我最好的鼓勵!謝謝:)
每個星期都會上新影片唷~
FB 粉絲團、YOUTUBE頻道🔍Nikki小閃
Ins、小紅書🔍nikkichien
Blog🔍http://nikita57.blogspot.com
less is more書 在 汪詩敏 Sylvia Youtube 的最佳解答
試了電腦的新剪接軟體結果磨皮過了頭臉好假🥲
剪完才發現too late
片頭的音量爆掉忘了拉低so sorry🙇🏻♀️
下次還是換回舊的app剪接吧😅
Business inquires 合作邀約 📩 dtjobs99@gmail.com
About Sylvia:
FB: http://www.facebook.com/sylwang
IG: http://www.instagram.com/syl_115
Pixnet: https://sylviawang1105.pixnet.net/blog
這不是合作影片!
less is more書 在 極簡姐姐 巧玉 Youtube 的最佳貼文
#極簡生活 #極簡主義 #斷捨離 #怦然心動 #極簡家園 #整理技巧 #極簡姐姐巧玉
極簡生活|7個整理技巧🏡|打造極簡主義家園|『The Minimalist Home』重點整理|極簡姐姐巧玉
今天要跟大家分享一本書《極簡主義家園》(The Minimalist Home)
《擁有越少,越幸福》約書亞·貝克在2018年的著作
整理一下書中七個整理技巧
和大家一起打造極簡主義家園😉
時間點標記
00:00 影片開始
00:26 技巧一
00:57 技巧二
01:24 技巧三
01:55 技巧四
02:23 技巧五
03:04 技巧六
03:44 技巧七
▪️更多影片
・簡單高效生活:https://ppt.cc/fcDFyx
・極簡理財系列:https://ppt.cc/fNo7zx
・極簡生活好物:https://ppt.cc/fpR3Qx
・極簡居家改造:https://ppt.cc/fxsKkx
▪️學習更多
跟我一起學習美股價值投資👉🏼https://ppt.cc/fbkjxx
跟我一起了解天賦順流致富👉🏼https://lihi1.com/qU0al
Follow me🙋♀️
👉成為高效晨型人 | 巧巧極簡生活提案:https://ppt.cc/fVAtRx
👉Instagram :chiao_talk https://www.instagram.com/chiao_talk/
👉FB粉絲頁:極簡姐姐 巧玉 https://www.facebook.com/Kayo-Lin-105...
👉Business Inquiries 商業合作:linchiaochiao88@gmail.com
✨如果影片對你有幫助請記得按讚👍並留言✍🏼告訴我喔💗
推薦影片
芬蘭網紅的極簡之家 The Home of Minimalism from Finland|一条Yit
https://youtu.be/2A7kjGzICA8
【透天厝翻新】極簡主義者改造老屋,過著空無一物的生活|100室內設計|100室內設計
https://youtu.be/vV-TXCh43go
收納師「極簡主義」家居大公開!香港 400 多呎單位竟然可以零雜物?| Room Tour | 斷捨離 | Harper's BAZAAR HK TV
https://youtu.be/YjxVqovOF2k
Q & A
📷相機:DJI OSMO POCKET 口袋雲台相機
💻電腦:2017 MacBook Pro 13吋
🎞剪輯:Adobe Premiere Pro
📱手機:iPhone X
🎵片尾:The Island - tubebackr
less is more書 在 極簡主義Less is more 的推薦與評價
給您最愜意的旅遊時光。 期待10月中旬前試營運喔 ☘️極簡主義民宿Less is more 田中央 ... ... <看更多>
less is more書 在 解读52本经典好书46.《少即是多》:北欧自由生活意见 ... 的推薦與評價
解读52本经典好书46.《少即是多》:北欧自由生活意见。为什么北欧国家幸福指数高? Less is More. 22K views · 3 years ago ...more ... ... <看更多>
less is more書 在 [字彙] Less is more - 精華區Eng-Class - 批踢踢實業坊 的推薦與評價
請問Less is more是什麼意思呢?
謝謝~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.118.109.133
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: PINGU (OFFB) 看板: Eng-Class
標題: Re: [字彙] Less is more
時間: Sat May 21 01:50:32 2005
並不一定是 "少即是多" 的意思.想想看一個你很討厭的東西,就是再少,
對你來說還是覺得太多了.例如:
Even though they have cut down a great deal on the tobacco
commercials, for many health-conscious people, less is still
more.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.121.209.219
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: madmarian (你我相遇在夏天,正好) 看板: Eng-Class
標題: Re: [字彙] Less is more
時間: Sat May 21 21:04:35 2005
Less is more亦是多年前由設計師Philip Starck喊出的口號,
少即是多,推崇極簡主義的看似簡單,卻用意不凡.
90年代初期幾個服裝設計師 Jil Sander, Helmut Lang,
Giorgio Armani, Donna Karen, Yohji Yamamoto一直到Calvin Klein或多或少
都被歸類為"less is more"的擁護者.
後來也出現了"反less is more"的相關字眼"less is bore."
不過還得看原文要表達的是單純的字義,還是說有論述到設計概念.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.5.20
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <
作者: lyremoon (我是豬腦袋T^T) 看板: Eng-Class
標題: Re: [字彙] Less is more
時間: Sat May 21 23:42:53 2005
※ 引述《madmarian (你我相遇在夏天,正好)》之銘言:
: Less is more亦是多年前由設計師Philip Starck喊出的口號,
: 少即是多,推崇極簡主義的看似簡單,卻用意不凡.
less is more的起源應該更早
一般認為是德國的建築設計師
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe(1886~1969)所提出的主張
也是現代主義建築的基本信念
"簡單便是繁複"--除去不必要的裝飾後,建築架構本身的美感反而越突顯出來
當然就像所有主義 越發展越走向極端
現代主義的建築風格已經不是簡約
根本是"空盪盪"了!!
Robert Venturi曾在learning from las vegas(1972)一書中
將前輩的話改成︰"less is a bore"
此時建築風格也轉向後現代
不過在日常生活中
"less is more--少即是多" 這句話才剛要被人們奉為圭臬
1973年石油危機爆發
當時油價居高不下 物價指數節節攀升
英國(??)有位作家出了一本書
書名便是 "less is more"
提倡 "簡單的生活才是豐富"
剛好切中情勢 在那不景氣的年代還狂銷勒
這時人們也體悟到 "看似少的東西,所獲得的效益其實更大
最有名的例子︰
日本車又窄又小 一點也不氣派
什麼都越大越好的美國人原本是看不上眼的
但油價飆漲後 寬敞豪華的美國車太過耗油
反而是輕薄短小的日本車吃油少 又不必常維修
一下子風靡歐美
小小的車子 效益反而比大車來得高
這不就是 "less is more" 的最佳例證嗎:)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 192.83.167.47
... <看更多>