【劍橋辯論會(Cambridge Union)演說:China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong】
雖不獲法庭批准離港,我仍在上週透過視像會議方式,參與英國劍橋辯論會(Cambridge Union)的辯論「This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong」。
發言期間,除解說香港淪落為警察城市(Police State)的源由,直斥在習近平主政下,人民權利不斷受到侵害;我亦以武漢肺炎為例,提到政權面對疫情爆發,多番以中國國家利益與民族認同,凌駕港人切身安危。
其實官員拒絕完全封關和強制隔離入境陸客,同時兩地社會融合與經濟活動在過去十年越加頻繁,反倒成為香港憂慮疫情難以受控的主因,更說明港中區隔的當務之急,而管治失能只會促使民間自救呼聲越加頻繁,不再寄望和依賴政府。
https://youtu.be/xx0uGpJV38U
#眾志國際連結 #SelfGovernance
Cambridge Union Debate: This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong
When we speak of Imperial Power, it doesn’t necessarily mean a colonial power. But we are referring to an act of expanding influence and authority over a territory through political, legal, economic or even military means. And indeed, the Chinese communist government has exerted that influence over Hong Kong since the Handover in 1997 and escalated that influence more rapidly and more aggressively after 2003.
The principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ is a fragile ruling philosophy defining China-Hong Kong relations, guaranteeing the global financial city its autonomy. But in the past 22 years, Beijing intervened on many fronts already, abusing this ruling philosophy and implementing authoritarian measures upon Hong Kong citizens.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-
My activism experience serves as a clear case for the motion. Hong Kong’s civil society has long been the constant target of state attack, and the motive is crystal clear: to eradicate opposition in order to maintain China’s dominating influence over Hong Kong. The Oppression of personal freedoms is merely one case in point.
Last year in June, shortly after serving my prison sentence, I went protesting against the controversial extradition bill, exercising my freedom to assembly. The government arrested me again and charged me of inciting people taking part in an unlawful assembly. Then I went contesting in local election, yet the government banned me from running for office because of my political stance.
I then turned to international advocacy, planning to fly to the United Kingdom and other European countries to explain our democratic and peaceful cause. Regrettably, the court thought this parliamentary hearing is not important and rejected my travel application. Every time I spoke in parliamentary hearings, no matter in person or via skype, the Chinese foreign ministry would condemn that parliament for colliding with a so-called separatist who has never advocated independence.
Following these encounters, it's become clear now I'm deprived of the right to the election, freedom of movement, freedom of assembly (not allowed to appear on designated area), and freedom of speech. The civil liberties guaranteed in the constitution are however no longer applicable to me. These oppressive measures are not out of political context.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-
#重點在此 I’d also argue that time and again, China’s national pride and interests override Hong Kong’s own interests. The development in the past decade has shown that many of the competitive edges of Hong Kong as a global financial city like rule of law, free flow of information, checks and balances are compromised and give way to Xi Jinping’s Chinese Dream. The Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak precisely explain this argument. Hong Kong, given its proximity to mainland China, is highly prone to infection and spread of disease.
Instead of taking strict measures to prevent public health crisis from erupting, the Hong Kong government, as of today, still refused to close the border, allowing countless potential cases flee to Hong Kong and further dampen the burden of Hong Kong’s medical services. From the moment that Xi Jinping’s image become the top priority, the autonomous decision-making mechanism of the Hong Kong government has collapsed.
The opposing side may argue that China is not imperial power in HK because integration and cooperation in the past have fostered but not encroached economic development in Hong Kong and our city does benefit from it. I’m afraid I cannot agree with this viewpoint at all.
Growing socio-economic integration with China, more connected transport infrastructure like the High-Speed Railway, are accounted for the city’s outbreak of Coronavirus. The first five patients confirmed positive to the virus were passengers of the Railway. Behind the grand narratives of ‘economic integration’ is more blatant aggression of the Hong Kong system. Hong Kong always has to give in and make up for its sovereign country’s faulty policy.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-
In conclusion, I have two questions for everyone. Can citizens in New York directly elected their mayor? Yes. Can citizens in London directly their mayor? Yes. We are not asking go too far, but just hope to ask for election rather that selection under Chinese rule to hand-pick those Beijing Loyalists.People in Hong Kong is not experiencing rule of law but only suffering from rule by tear gas. The root cause of crisi is police brutality, which included live round fired towards high school students, young lady being gang rape in police stations and 8000 people arrested from the age of 11 to 84.
When offenses are committed and the offenders are prosecuted as is now happening, there’s no damage to the rule of law at all. It’s only when police officers who beat people up and none of them has even been arrested, that the rule of law is damaged. There’s no rule of law when the brutality of police officers goes unpunished!
Therefore, the House should recognize the fact that China is not only the new imperial power in HK, but it is also an authoritarian and oppressive imperial power since Emperor Xi took over the power. The continuing intervention of the Chinese authorities in Hong Kong’s local affairs presents a fundamental challenge to the continuation of HK peoples identity and way of life.
We are proud to be HongKongers and we hope to determine our own future. That’s the reason for cross-generation of HKers to fight for freedom and wish you can stand with Hong Kong. Thank you.
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「allowing in a sentence」的推薦目錄:
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最讚貼文
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 Roundfinger Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 How to use "allowing" in a sentence - YouTube 的評價
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 Allow | Make a sentence below using the word 'allow'! | Verb 的評價
- 關於allowing in a sentence 在 Can start sentence with "Allowing to" - English Stack Exchange 的評價
allowing in a sentence 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳解答
【劍橋辯論會(Cambridge Union)演說:China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong】
雖不獲法庭批准離港,我仍在上週透過視像會議方式,參與英國劍橋辯論會(Cambridge Union)的辯論「This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong」。
發言期間,除解說香港淪落為警察城市(Police State)的源由,直斥在習近平主政下,人民權利不斷受到侵害;我亦以武漢肺炎為例,提到政權面對疫情爆發,多番以中國國家利益與民族認同,凌駕港人切身安危。
其實官員拒絕完全封關和強制隔離入境陸客,同時兩地社會融合與經濟活動在過去十年越加頻繁,反倒成為香港憂慮疫情難以受控的主因,更說明港中區隔的當務之急,而管治失能只會促使民間自救呼聲越加頻繁,不再寄望和依賴政府。
https://youtu.be/xx0uGpJV38U
#眾志國際連結 #SelfGovernance
Cambridge Union Debate: This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong
When we speak of Imperial Power, it doesn’t necessarily mean a colonial power. But we are referring to an act of expanding influence and authority over a territory through political, legal, economic or even military means. And indeed, the Chinese communist government has exerted that influence over Hong Kong since the Handover in 1997 and escalated that influence more rapidly and more aggressively after 2003.
The principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ is a fragile ruling philosophy defining China-Hong Kong relations, guaranteeing the global financial city its autonomy. But in the past 22 years, Beijing intervened on many fronts already, abusing this ruling philosophy and implementing authoritarian measures upon Hong Kong citizens.
---------------------------------
My activism experience serves as a clear case for the motion. Hong Kong’s civil society has long been the constant target of state attack, and the motive is crystal clear: to eradicate opposition in order to maintain China’s dominating influence over Hong Kong. The Oppression of personal freedoms is merely one case in point.
Last year in June, shortly after serving my prison sentence, I went protesting against the controversial extradition bill, exercising my freedom to assembly. The government arrested me again and charged me of inciting people taking part in an unlawful assembly. Then I went contesting in local election, yet the government banned me from running for office because of my political stance.
I then turned to international advocacy, planning to fly to the United Kingdom and other European countries to explain our democratic and peaceful cause. Regrettably, the court thought this parliamentary hearing is not important and rejected my travel application. Every time I spoke in parliamentary hearings, no matter in person or via skype, the Chinese foreign ministry would condemn that parliament for colliding with a so-called separatist who has never advocated independence.
Following these encounters, it's become clear now I'm deprived of the right to the election, freedom of movement, freedom of assembly (not allowed to appear on designated area), and freedom of speech. The civil liberties guaranteed in the constitution are however no longer applicable to me. These oppressive measures are not out of political context.
---------------------------------
#重點在此 I’d also argue that time and again, China’s national pride and interests override Hong Kong’s own interests. The development in the past decade has shown that many of the competitive edges of Hong Kong as a global financial city like rule of law, free flow of information, checks and balances are compromised and give way to Xi Jinping’s Chinese Dream. The Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak precisely explain this argument. Hong Kong, given its proximity to mainland China, is highly prone to infection and spread of disease.
Instead of taking strict measures to prevent public health crisis from erupting, the Hong Kong government, as of today, still refused to close the border, allowing countless potential cases flee to Hong Kong and further dampen the burden of Hong Kong’s medical services. From the moment that Xi Jinping’s image become the top priority, the autonomous decision-making mechanism of the Hong Kong government has collapsed.
The opposing side may argue that China is not imperial power in HK because integration and cooperation in the past have fostered but not encroached economic development in Hong Kong and our city does benefit from it. I’m afraid I cannot agree with this viewpoint at all.
Growing socio-economic integration with China, more connected transport infrastructure like the High-Speed Railway, are accounted for the city’s outbreak of Coronavirus. The first five patients confirmed positive to the virus were passengers of the Railway. Behind the grand narratives of ‘economic integration’ is more blatant aggression of the Hong Kong system. Hong Kong always has to give in and make up for its sovereign country’s faulty policy.
---------------------------------
In conclusion, I have two questions for everyone. Can citizens in New York directly elected their mayor? Yes. Can citizens in London directly their mayor? Yes. We are not asking go too far, but just hope to ask for election rather that selection under Chinese rule to hand-pick those Beijing Loyalists.People in Hong Kong is not experiencing rule of law but only suffering from rule by tear gas. The root cause of crisi is police brutality, which included live round fired towards high school students, young lady being gang rape in police stations and 8000 people arrested from the age of 11 to 84.
When offenses are committed and the offenders are prosecuted as is now happening, there’s no damage to the rule of law at all. It’s only when police officers who beat people up and none of them has even been arrested, that the rule of law is damaged. There’s no rule of law when the brutality of police officers goes unpunished!
Therefore, the House should recognize the fact that China is not only the new imperial power in HK, but it is also an authoritarian and oppressive imperial power since Emperor Xi took over the power. The continuing intervention of the Chinese authorities in Hong Kong’s local affairs presents a fundamental challenge to the continuation of HK peoples identity and way of life.
We are proud to be HongKongers and we hope to determine our own future. That’s the reason for cross-generation of HKers to fight for freedom and wish you can stand with Hong Kong. Thank you.
allowing in a sentence 在 Roundfinger Facebook 的最佳貼文
เราคือผู้รับผิดชอบความสุขของตัวเอง
---
แต่ละวันที่ตื่นขึ้นมา เราเผชิญหน้ากับสารพัดสิ่งสารพันผู้คน ล้วนกระทบกระแทกจิตใจให้กระเด้งกระดอนไปทางนั้นทางนี้แทบทุกวินาที เบาบ้าง หนักบ้าง
บางวันชวนให้รู้สึกเหมือนลูกปิงปองที่ถูกตีไปมา ตีให้โกรธ ตีให้อิจฉา ตีให้เจ็บปวด ตามทิศทางที่ผู้คนและชะตาชีวิตเหวี่ยงเข้ากระแทกเรา
...Continue ReadingWe are responsible for our own happiness.
---
Every day we wake up, we face many things. People hit the heart to bounce. This way. Almost every second. It's light.
Some days, I feel like a ping pong ball that was beaten to be angry. Hit to be jealous, hurt in the direction that people and destiny hit us.
Looking at this dimension as if we wake up each day to " be " treated " from everything around like we live to be " doer
Automatically, most people choose to be " doer " without knowing. If you think quickly, being a doer is tired and painful. But in fact, the one who chooses to be a doer is less tired than choosing to be " doer " for life.
Every time we choose to be a "doer" we allow ourselves to complain. We throw responsibility to others to give fate to the sky. We push the burden to everyone. Everything is wrong except ourselves.
I have an appointment and go late. I blame traffic jam. I don't understand. I blame opponents. I don't work. I look for who should be blamed. Love is not fulfilled. We point my
This is how tired and easy it is. Just point your finger at others and accept the pain caused by being " doer we are not responsible for life. Besides, we can also ask for sympathy from those around you.
Being a "doer" often makes us weak and used to do it often, the more we specialise in pushing the burden and throwing mistakes to others.
Without knowing, we will slowly become people who feel like this life is not mine or I was born to be struck by fate.
When you don't take responsibility for your own life, others and other things control our lives.
Because we don't " do " with life, life " does " to us.
This kind of habit, if you keep collecting, we will become weak, discouraged, bored in it. Whether it's studying, work, relationship and may take over our whole life.
...
So it is the difference of those who live by seeing themselves as " President " of the sentence and those who live by seeing themselves as " Karma " of the sentence.
The President will write sentences, "I did this different from the karma who wrote the sentence," this is done to me
"that person hurt me, hurt me"
So different from
"it's me who endured the pain from trying to make him love"
"Co-workers are so bad. We can't make our job go to dream"
So different from
"I don't change my colleagues to dream together"
This is just an example. We can change the sentence that put ourselves in the position of " Karma " that was committed in front of the sentence to be " President " which is the one who has committed to life for many more choices.
What's different is that as soon as we bring ourselves as "Chairman" of a sentence in life, we will change the idea of what I should do. Good for that situation
In that second we will see that we can choose.
In that second we will see that we can change lives.
In that second we will see that we can solve the problem.
In that second we will see that we are free
Free from being determined by other fate. At least we can step out of that problem. Step out of suffering. Don't sit still and complain or think like "doer"
We open our arms and take responsibility for our lives. It may be heavier than throwing mistakes to others. But this is the only way we can change our lives without waiting for others to change.
When we take responsibility, our life will be powerful.
When we are "Chairman" we will act.
When we act, we will be free to the bad things we thought were the things that hurt us, irritated, stuck.
Not allowing them to be done. We will rise to do our own lives.
When will I start to feel like my life is not happy or dead. Try to sit still and look at yourself if we live by complaining about other people more than standing up to take responsibility for your life.
Do we place ourselves as " doer " or " doer
We are " President " or " Karma " of sentences.
In a novel named "life"Translated
allowing in a sentence 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳貼文
allowing in a sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
allowing in a sentence 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的精選貼文
allowing in a sentence 在 Allow | Make a sentence below using the word 'allow'! | Verb 的推薦與評價
Allow | Make a sentence below using the word ' allow '! | Verb: to give permission for someone to do something, or to not prevent something ... ... <看更多>
allowing in a sentence 在 Can start sentence with "Allowing to" - English Stack Exchange 的推薦與評價
This is a better way of putting it: Allowing detection of only circular shape objects, objects mistakenly classified as trees, ... ... <看更多>
allowing in a sentence 在 How to use "allowing" in a sentence - YouTube 的推薦與評價
Learn how to use " allowing" in a sentence. If you have been looking for the Short & Simple Example Sentence For "allowing" or allowing in ... ... <看更多>